I just wanted to clarify what is meant by support.  I see a couple
different ways this could be done.  I'm pretty sure we're all talking about
Process 1 below, but wanted to get a discussion going on what we're
proposing.  If we're considering Process 2 or 3, I think we need to be more
explicit about the circumstances where pull requests will be backported.

So for the scenario of a PR of some feature/bugfix/improvement into master
(aka 4.x):

Process 1)
- It is only pulled into Master.  A separate PR can be made for the 3.x
branch if desired, but likely won't.

Process 2)
- It is pulled into Master and also backported into branch 3.x if trivial
(easy, no conflicts, or minimal re-write effort).

Process 3)
- It is pulled into Master and also backported into branch 3.x provided it
is applicable and below some maximum effort threshold.







On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 10:17 AM, Adina Crainiceanu <ad...@usna.edu> wrote:

> I agree with supporting two branches of development for now: 3.x and 4.x.
>
> In the 4.x branch we should update all dependencies, as Jurgen suggested. I
> think it is OK to update the master to be the 4.x development line.
>
> Thanks,
> Adina
>
> On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 10:04 AM, Brown, Jennifer <
> jennifer.br...@parsons.com> wrote:
>
> > I agree that it is time to upgrade to the latest version of RDF4J and
> that
> > this should involve a major version increment.
> >
> > To provide time for Rya users to upgrade, I think that we should support
> a
> > 3.x branch and a 4.x branch for the near future (minimally the end of the
> > calendar year) and then reevaluate continuing to maintain 3.x.
> >
> > Best Regards,
> >
> > Jen
> >
> > Jennifer Brown
> > Project Manager, Semantic Technologies
> > PARSONS
> > 1911 N. Fort Myer Dr. Ste 800
> > Arlington, VA 22209
> > Phone: (703) 797-3136
> > Fax: (703) 522-6310
> > jennifer.br...@parsons.com<mailto:jennifer.br...@parsons.com>
> > www.parsons.com
> >
> > On Apr 9, 2018, at 12:30 PM, Chilton, Kevin <kevin.chil...@parsons.com<
> > mailto:kevin.chil...@parsons.com>> wrote:
> >
> > Hey Rya devs,
> >
> > I'd like to get PR #245 (RYA-405) pulled in.  This is a pretty big
> > dependency change, and should probably involve a major version increment
> to
> > 4.0.0.  Could we get a discussion going on the devlist about if we want
> to
> > support a 3.x branch and a 4.x branch going forward, or just update
> master
> > to 4.x.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Kevin
> >
> > NOTICE: This email message and all attachments transmitted with it may
> > contain privileged and confidential information, and information that is
> > protected by, and proprietary to, Parsons Corporation, and is intended
> > solely for the use of the addressee for the specific purpose set forth in
> > this communication. If the reader of this message is not the intended
> > recipient, you are hereby notified that any reading, dissemination,
> > distribution, copying, or other use of this message or its attachments is
> > strictly prohibited, and you should delete this message and all copies
> and
> > backups thereof. The recipient may not further distribute or use any of
> the
> > information contained herein without the express written authorization of
> > the sender. If you have received this message in error, or if you have
> any
> > questions regarding the use of the proprietary information contained
> > therein, please contact the sender of this message immediately, and the
> > sender will provide you with further instructions.
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Dr. Adina Crainiceanu
> Associate Professor
> Computer Science Department
> United States Naval Academy
> 410-293-6822
> ad...@usna.edu
> http://www.usna.edu/Users/cs/adina/
>

Reply via email to