Hi, Just for me to be clear: GM, we’re talking rebasing locally but merge > committing in the repo right? Like we have been doing before? At least, > that’s how I read this right now. correct me if I’m wrong? >
Yes, that's what I meant. Rebase the master locally (never commit to the local master), fork, merge commit back in the repo (possibly squashing all the commits on the branch in a single one that represents the patch). Cheers, -- Gianmarco
