Hi Renato,

There maybe a misunderstanding in the concept. Consumer is to feed the msgs
into the Samza, while Producer is to send the msg from Samza to other
systems. So if you implement the Consumer, should be able to see the msgs
in the StreamTask. That's why you confuse Naveen.

Cheers,

Fang, Yan
yanfang...@gmail.com

On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 9:59 AM, Guozhang Wang <wangg...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello Renato,
>
> Could you paste your console consumer command here?
>
> Guozhang
>
> On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 9:43 AM, Naveen S <navg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hey Renato,
> >                     Is there any specific reason why you are extending
> the
> > blocking envelope class instead of implementing a StreamTask ?
> > http://samza.apache.org/learn/documentation/0.9/api/overview.html
> >
> > --Naveen
> >
> >
> > On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 8:06 AM, Renato Marroquín Mogrovejo <
> > renatoj.marroq...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi there,
> > >
> > > I have developed an RSS reader application using Samza but I am having
> > > problems when using kafka-console-consumer to read what has been gotten
> > > from the RSS feeds.
> > > My RssConsumer uses an object RssFeed which fetches (until stopped by
> the
> > > RssConsumer) all new rss feeds and hands them back to the RssConsumer
> > which
> > > puts them into a single partition[2]. So from my logs I can see that
> > there
> > > are new feeds being put into my partition but I can not get them with
> > > consoler consumer, I guess I am not putting them correctly or I am
> > > producing some blocking behaviour somehow?
> > > I using hello-samza 0.10 project which uses the latest Samza version as
> > > well. I don't think this is an issue with Samza, it is probably
> > something I
> > > am doing wrong :(
> > > Thanks in advance for any suggestions.
> > >
> > >
> > > Renato M.
> > >
> > > [1] https://github.com/renato2099/hello-samza
> > > [2]
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/renato2099/hello-samza/blob/master/src/main/java/samza/examples/rss/system/RssConsumer.java#L42
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> -- Guozhang
>

Reply via email to