s/test-patch/check-all/

Guess which project I've been working on?

On 1 July 2015 at 21:22, Jakob Homan <jgho...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 (binding).  Artifacts are good, tests pass, code looks good.  Found
> minor issue with test-patch (SAMZA-726), but doesn't affect release.
>
> It's pretty standard to run weekend- or holiday-strattling votes for five 
> days.
>
> -Jakob
>
>
> On 1 July 2015 at 20:49, Milinda Pathirage <mpath...@umail.iu.edu> wrote:
>> +1 for extending the voting period.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Milinda
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 8:27 PM, Yi Pan <nickpa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi, team,
>>>
>>> 72 hours have passed. So far, we got 2 binding votes and 2 non-binding
>>> votes, all +1. I am proposing to extend 1 more day to 12:00pm 7/2/2015
>>> Thursday.
>>>
>>> Does it sound good to everyone?
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>> -Yi
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 12:15 PM, Navina Ramesh
>>> <nram...@linkedin.com.invalid
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>> > +1
>>> >
>>> > Verified MD5 & asc signatures. Local build & check-all.sh passed.
>>> >
>>> > Thanks!
>>> > Navina
>>> >
>>> > On 6/30/15, 7:13 PM, "Chris Riccomini" <criccom...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > >+1
>>> > >
>>> > >Verified MD5, and asc signature. Build locally, and all tests pass.
>>> > >
>>> > >Cheers,
>>> > >Chris
>>> > >
>>> > >On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 1:26 PM, Milinda Pathirage <
>>> mpath...@umail.iu.edu
>>> > >
>>> > >wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > >> +1 (non-binding)
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Verified signature. Tested locally using ./bin/check-all.sh.
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Thanks
>>> > >> Milinda
>>> > >>
>>> > >> On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 2:10 AM, Yan Fang <yanfang...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> > >>
>>> > >> > +1
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> > Verified MD5, Signature.
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> > Tested locally.
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> > Thanks,
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> > Fang, Yan
>>> > >> > yanfang...@gmail.com
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> > On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 12:31 PM, Yi Pan <nickpa...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> > > Hey all,
>>> > >> > >
>>> > >> > > This is a call for a vote on a release of Apache Samza 0.9.1. This
>>> > >>is a
>>> > >> > > bug-fix release against 0.9.0.
>>> > >> > >
>>> > >> > > The release candidate can be downloaded from here:
>>> > >> > >
>>> > >> > > http://people.apache.org/~nickpan47/samza-0.9.1-rc1/
>>> > >> > >
>>> > >> > > The release candidate is signed with pgp key 911402D8, which is
>>> > >> > > included in the repository's KEYS file:
>>> > >> > >
>>> > >> > >
>>> > >> > >
>>> > >> >
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> >
>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=samza.git;a=blob_plain;f=KEYS;h
>>> > >>b=6f5bafb6cd93934781161eb6b1868d11ea347c95
>>> > >> > >
>>> > >> > > and can also be found on keyservers:
>>> > >> > >
>>> > >> > > http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x911402D8
>>> > >> > >
>>> > >> > > The git tag is release-0.9.1-rc1 and signed with the same pgp key:
>>> > >> > >
>>> > >> > >
>>> > >> > >
>>> > >> >
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> >
>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=samza.git;a=tag;h=e78b9e7f34650
>>> > >>538b4bb68b338eb472b98a5709e
>>> > >> > >
>>> > >> > > Test binaries have been published to Maven's staging repository,
>>> and
>>> > >> are
>>> > >> > > available here:
>>> > >> > >
>>> > >>
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachesamza-1007/
>>> > >> > >
>>> > >> > > Note release 0.9.1 is still supporting JDK6 and the binaries were
>>> > >>built
>>> > >> > > with JDK6 without incident.
>>> > >> > >
>>> > >> > > 6 critical bugs were resolved for this release:
>>> > >> > >
>>> > >> > >
>>> > >> > >
>>> > >> >
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> >
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SAMZA-715?jql=project%20%3D%20SAMZA
>>> >
>>> >>%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.9.1%20AND%20status%20in%20%28Resolved%2C%20
>>> > >>Closed%29
>>> > >> > >
>>> > >> > > The vote will be open for 72 hours ( end in 12:00pm Wed,
>>> 07/01/2015
>>> > >>).
>>> > >> > > Please download the release candidate, check the hashes/signature,
>>> > >> build
>>> > >> > it
>>> > >> > > and test it, and then please vote:
>>> > >> > >
>>> > >> > > [ ] +1 approve
>>> > >> > > [ ] +0 no opinion
>>> > >> > > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>>> > >> > >
>>> > >> >
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >> --
>>> > >> Milinda Pathirage
>>> > >>
>>> > >> PhD Student | Research Assistant
>>> > >> School of Informatics and Computing | Data to Insight Center
>>> > >> Indiana University
>>> > >>
>>> > >> twitter: milindalakmal
>>> > >> skype: milinda.pathirage
>>> > >> blog: http://milinda.pathirage.org
>>> > >>
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Milinda Pathirage
>>
>> PhD Student | Research Assistant
>> School of Informatics and Computing | Data to Insight Center
>> Indiana University
>>
>> twitter: milindalakmal
>> skype: milinda.pathirage
>> blog: http://milinda.pathirage.org

Reply via email to