Roger, We upgraded from yarn 2.4 to 2.6 a while ago and been running it in prod with no issues. It was basically a drop in if I remember right.
Jordan > On Aug 20, 2015, at 1:48 PM, Yi Pan <nickpa...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, Selina, > > Samza 0.9.1 on YARN 2.6 is the proved working solution. > > Best, > > -Yi > >> On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 12:28 PM, Selina Tech <swucaree...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hi, Yi: >> If I use Samza0.9.1 and Yarn2.6.0, Will the system be failed? >> >> Sincerely, >> Selina >> >>> On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 1:58 PM, Yi Pan <nickpa...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, Roger, >>> >>> In LinkedIn we have already moved to YARN 2.6 and is moving to YARN 2.7 >>> now. I am not aware of any major issues in upgrading. I will let our team >>> member Jon Bringhurst to chime in since he did all the upgrade and may >> have >>> more insights. >>> >>> @Jon, could you help to comment on this? >>> >>> Thanks! >>> >>> -Yi >>> >>> On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 9:12 AM, Roger Hoover <roger.hoo...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> We're using 2.4.0 in production. Are there any major incompatibilities >>> to >>>> watch out for when upgrading to 2.6.0? >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>> Roger >>>> >>>> On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 4:41 PM, Yan Fang <yanfang...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi guys, >>>>> >>>>> we have been discussing upgrading to Yarn 2.6.0 (SAMZA-536 >>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SAMZA-536>), because there >> are >>>> some >>>>> bug fixes after 2.4.0 and we can not enable the Yarn RM recovering >>>> feature >>>>> in Yarn 2.4.0 (SAMZA-750 < >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SAMZA-750 >>>>>> ) >>>>> . >>>>> >>>>> So we just want to make sure if any production users are still using >>> Yarn >>>>> 2.4.0 and do not plan to upgrade to 2.6.0+? >>>>> >>>>> If not further concern, I think we can go and upgrade to Yarn 2.6.0 >> in >>>>> Samza 0.10.0 release. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> >>>>> Fang, Yan >>>>> yanfang...@gmail.com >>
