-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/47247/
-----------------------------------------------------------

Review request for samza, Boris Shkolnik, Chris Pettitt, Jake Maes, Navina 
Ramesh, Jagadish Venkatraman, Xinyu Liu, and Yi Pan (Data Infrastructure).


Bugs: SAMZA-947
    https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SAMZA-947


Repository: samza


Description
-------

SAMZA-947 - TaskAssignmentManager registration exception when partition count 
changes.

* Register the producer once at constructor time
* Don't bother registering the consumer. It's lifecycle is outside the 
TaskAssignmentManager and registering from the TAM ends up being a no-op.


Diffs
-----

  
samza-core/src/main/java/org/apache/samza/container/grouper/task/GroupByContainerCount.java
 286ea1b3d0d39ebd7d9923a81c02c1d0842b1291 
  
samza-core/src/main/java/org/apache/samza/container/grouper/task/TaskAssignmentManager.java
 0cbdec8ac050de18c2fea191e3ef38273f1dbab1 
  
samza-core/src/test/java/org/apache/samza/container/grouper/task/TestTaskAssignmentManager.java
 19ab78e891ca22b6fba430ded6b9382c860a212d 

Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/47247/diff/


Testing
-------

Manually tested with a job. Adjusted the input topics to induce a partition 
change and verified no exceptions and the TaskAssignmentManager cleanup ran 
appropriately.

2016-05-11 17:34:33 GroupByContainerCount [WARN] Current task count 32 does not 
match saved task count 512. Stateful jobs may observe misalignment of keys!
...
2016-05-11 17:34:34 TaskAssignmentManager [INFO] Task "Partition 15" moved from 
container 57 to container null
2016-05-11 17:34:34 TaskAssignmentManager [INFO] Task "Partition 14" moved from 
container 46 to container null
2016-05-11 17:34:34 TaskAssignmentManager [INFO] Task "Partition 13" moved from 
container 35 to container null
2016-05-11 17:34:34 TaskAssignmentManager [INFO] Task "Partition 19" moved from 
container 101 to container null
...


Thanks,

Jake Maes

Reply via email to