That's great news. Will be keeping an eye on the release.

On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 10:12 AM Jacob Maes <jm...@linkedin.com.invalid>
wrote:

> Hey David,
>
> I think that behavior is meant to prevent an issue on the Kafka 0.8
> Brokers. Samza 10.1 allows compression on log compacted topics, but you'll
> need to make sure you're using Kafka 0.9 or higher on the Brokers.
>
> -Jake
>
> On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 10:57 PM, David Yu <david...@optimizely.com> wrote:
>
> > I guess this might be the problem:
> >
> > 2016-08-06 05:23:23,622 [main ] WARN  o.a.s.s.kafka.KafkaSystemFactory$ -
> > System name 'kafka' is being used as a changelog. Disabling compression
> > since Kafka does not support compression for log compacted topics.
> >
> >
> > Is this a 0.8.x.x Kafka producer limitation?
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 4:25 PM Jacob Maes <jacob.m...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hey David,
> > >
> > > If you check your container logs Kafka should print the producer config
> > >
> > > > 2016-08-05 19:18:30.134 [main] ProducerConfig [INFO] ProducerConfig
> > > values:
> > > > compression.type = gzip
> > >
> > > ...
> > >
> > > If you see the correct compression type in that config, then the Kafka
> > > producer definitely has compression enabled.
> > >
> > >
> > > If it's still not compressing after confirming that setting then it
> > > means snappy wasn't able to compress your messages. I talked to our
> > > Kafka team and they said that's not uncommon. You might want to try
> > > gzip or some other compression.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 12:10 PM, David Yu <david...@optimizely.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > I'm reporting back my observations after enabling compression.
> > > >
> > > > Looks like compression is not doing anything. I'm still seeing
> > > > "compression-rate-avg=1.0" and the same "record-size-avg" from JMX
> > > > "kafka.producer" metrics.
> > > >
> > > > I did set the following:
> > > > systems.kafka.producer.compression.type=snappy
> > > >
> > > > Am I missing anything?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > David
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 1:48 PM David Yu <david...@optimizely.com>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Great. Thx.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 1:42 PM Jacob Maes <jacob.m...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> Hey David,
> > > > >>
> > > > >> what gets written to the changelog topic
> > > > >>
> > > > >> The changelog gets the same value as the store, which is the
> > > serialized
> > > > >> form of the key and value. The serdes for the store are configured
> > > with
> > > > >> the
> > > > >> properties:
> > > > >> stores.store-name.key.serde
> > > > >> stores.store-name.msg.serde
> > > > >>
> > > > >> If I want to compress the changelog topic, do I enable that from
> the
> > > > >> > producer?
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Yes. When you specify the changelog for your store, you specify it
> > in
> > > > >> terms
> > > > >> of a SystemStream (typically a Kafka topic). In the part of the
> > config
> > > > >> where you define the Kafka system, you can pass any Kafka producer
> > > > config
> > > > >> <http://kafka.apache.org/documentation.html#newproducerconfigs>.
> So
> > > to
> > > > >> configure compression you should configure the following property.
> > > > >> systems.system-name.producer.compression.type
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Hope this helps.
> > > > >> -Jake
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 11:16 AM, David Yu <
> david...@optimizely.com>
> > > > >> wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> > I'm trying to understand what gets written to the changelog
> topic.
> > > Is
> > > > it
> > > > >> > just the serialized value of the particular state store entry?
> If
> > I
> > > > >> want to
> > > > >> > compress the changelog topic, do I enable that from the
> producer?
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > The reason I'm asking is that, we are seeing producer throughput
> > > > issues
> > > > >> and
> > > > >> > suspected that writing to changelog takes up most of the network
> > > > >> bandwidth.
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > Thanks,
> > > > >> > David
> > > > >> >
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to