Thanks Chris. I'll keep digging into it. It's a really strange issue... on my 
machine, run-job.sh still works fine (with the 127.0.0.1 setting and without 
the YARN_HOME env var). I'll check out the YARN source and see if that gives 
any clues.

I'm running on Mac OS -- you too?

Martin

On 21 Feb 2014, at 19:26, Chris Riccomini <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hey Martin,
> 
> Yea, that's somewhat alarming. I merged your commit, but after that
> commit, now I'm unable to get run-job.sh working. I opened a JIRA for this:
> 
>  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SAMZA-154
> 
> 
> I'm going to revert the commit for now, until we understand this better.
> 
> Cheers,
> Chris
> 
> On 2/21/14 7:11 AM, "Martin Kleppmann" <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> Did a bit more experimentation: whether it works or not seems to vary
>> depending on the network my laptop is connected to. It works at my home,
>> but it doesn't work at my girlfriend's apartment! Also whether or not I'm
>> connected to the company's VPN seems to make a difference.
>> 
>> It might be due to DNS: looks like YARN does some lookups to determine
>> the current machine's FQDN. That's probably very useful in a datacenter,
>> but the results are somewhat undefined when using a laptop on a wifi
>> connection of dubious quality.
>> 
>> So far I'm having success with the following config:
>> 
>> 1. A change to yarn-site.xml, telling it to always look for the RM on
>> localhost: https://github.com/linkedin/hello-samza/pull/20
>> 
>> 2. echo "127.0.0.1 `hostname`" >> /etc/hosts  (otherwise the RM refuses
>> to start up if it can't reach a DNS server to resolve the hostname)
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> Martin
>> 
>> On 20 Feb 2014, at 00:34, Martin Kleppmann <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>> Yeah, I checked -- no old YARN processes running. ZK and Kafka are the
>>> only other two Java processes running on my machine.
>>> 
>>> Martin
>>> 
>>> On 20 Feb 2014, at 00:20, Chris Riccomini <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>> Hey Martin,
>>>> 
>>>> Have you checked if you've leaked a NM process?
>>>> 
>>>> I've seen cases in the past where an NM wasn't properly shutdown, and
>>>> the
>>>> pid was over-written. Could be that.
>>>> 
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Chris
>>>> 
>>>> On 2/19/14 4:18 PM, "Martin Kleppmann" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>> 
>>>>> I'm suddenly having problems with YARN as set up by hello-samza. It
>>>>> was
>>>>> working fine earlier today and I don't recall changing anything in my
>>>>> setup -- so I just wanted to check if anyone has seen this before.
>>>>> 
>>>>> The YARN resourcemanager seems to start up fine (at least the web UI
>>>>> works, and nothing strange-looking in the log). But when the
>>>>> nodemanager
>>>>> starts, I see a lot of this in its logs:
>>>>> 
>>>>> 14/02/20 00:00:04 INFO ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server:
>>>>> 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0:8031. Already tried 0 time(s); maxRetries=45
>>>>> 14/02/20 00:00:08 INFO ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server:
>>>>> 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0:8031. Already tried 0 time(s); retry policy is
>>>>> RetryUpToMaximumCountWithFixedSleep(maxRetries=10, sleepTime=1
>>>>> SECONDS)
>>>>> 14/02/20 00:00:09 INFO ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server:
>>>>> 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0:8031. Already tried 1 time(s); retry policy is
>>>>> RetryUpToMaximumCountWithFixedSleep(maxRetries=10, sleepTime=1
>>>>> SECONDS)
>>>>> 14/02/20 00:00:11 INFO ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server:
>>>>> 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0:8031. Already tried 2 time(s); retry policy is
>>>>> RetryUpToMaximumCountWithFixedSleep(maxRetries=10, sleepTime=1
>>>>> SECONDS)
>>>>> 14/02/20 00:00:12 INFO ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server:
>>>>> 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0:8031. Already tried 3 time(s); retry policy is
>>>>> RetryUpToMaximumCountWithFixedSleep(maxRetries=10, sleepTime=1
>>>>> SECONDS)
>>>>> 
>>>>> ...etc repeating every few seconds, and never connecting. But the RM
>>>>> is
>>>>> listening on localhost:8031 (verified with netcat).
>>>>> 
>>>>> run-job.sh similarly sits there, writing a similar message to
>>>>> hello-samza/deploy/samza/undefined-samza-container-name.log every few
>>>>> seconds (but with port 8032 instead of 8031).
>>>>> 
>>>>> Any ideas?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Martin
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
> 

Reply via email to