Hey Jakob, Fair enough. I'm all for deleting code.
Cheers, Chris On 2/25/14 1:41 PM, "Jakob Homan" <[email protected]> wrote: >No harm and the maintenance support tax is low. I just like to delete >code. If no one speaks up that they're using it, is there any reason to >keep it? > > >On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 1:38 PM, Chris Riccomini ><[email protected]>wrote: > >> Hey Jakob, >> >> I'm all for moving to 2.10 as the default. I also agree that we should >> continue to support 2.9. >> >> Regarding 2.8 deletion, is there any harm to supporting it right now? >> >> Cheers, >> Chris >> >> On 2/25/14 1:34 PM, "Jakob Homan" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >Currently we support Scala 2.8, 2.9 and 2.10. 2.8 is ancient. 2.9 is >> >reasonable and, my guess is that 2.10 is the most common. Our default >>is >> >2.9. >> > >> >Since 2.10 is the most common, it may make sense to make the default >>2.10. >> > >> >Is there anyone out there still relying on 2.8? Are there any >>objections >> >to removing support for it? >> >>
