OP here, thanks to everyone for your thoughts. Replies inline:

In reply to Jakob, thanks for the pointer to SAMZA-18, that's good to know.
I probably won't hold my breath waiting for it though :)

In reply to Martin:

> Were you envisaging that such API calls could be made over a protocol
> that uses stdout and stdin as its transport? I'm sure it can be done, but
> the protocol would not be totally straightforward, as it would have to do
> things like match a request from the child process (on stdout) with a
> response to the API call (on stdin).

Samza currently has the nice property of having one message in flight at a
time per partition. I think we'd want to preserve that and avoid adding any
pipelining by having multiple messages in flight. So that means we could
use a synchronous protocol over stdin/stdout that doesn't need to match
requests to responses. Please correct me if I'm wrong on this, I'm still
very new to Samza.

In reply to Jay, I take your point about Hadoop Streaming. Adding
lifecycle/control messages to the protocol seems beneficial. We could also
allow the external process to access the KV store in the JVM via the
stdin/stdout protocol. We'd also want to use an encoding scheme that
doesn't have problems with separators (Hadoop Streaming has trouble with
data that contains internal tabs and newlines). I think I'd prefer
protobufs over JSON for performance reasons, but it could be configurable.

So it seems like this is doable. There are some design questions but maybe
a proof of concept would be a good next step. We'll be in touch if/when
that happens. If anyone else wants to try it, we'd welcome that also :)

Cheers,
Dave




On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 8:58 AM, Jay Kreps <[email protected]> wrote:

> Yes, I think all I am saying is that stdin/stdout aren't so bad. The
> mistake made by Hadoop streaming I think was to not specify a more detailed
> extensible control protocol for the client process. (or at least that
> seemed to be true a long-ass time ago when I last used Hadoop streaming).
> You would presumably model commands like commit as outputs and config and
> such as input and you would need so predetermined data format to read and
> write the topic/partition/key/value pairs. Sounds like Storm did a better
> job here.
>
> As you say this protocol needn't go over stdin/out but it is fairly cheap
> and I think unix domain sockets are not well supported in Java.
>
> As you say you definitely don't get the full power out of the box. For
> example the key-value store would have to be in the child process and all
> we could provide would be the backing changelog stream.
>
> Basically I am saying the maintenance burden of doing this seems low--it's
> just a simple samza job that manages a native subprocess and feeds it
> formatted input--so there is no harm in pursuing both approaches...
>
> -Jay
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 6:10 PM, Martin Kleppmann
> <[email protected]>wrote:
>
> > If we want to make non-JVM languages first-class citizens in Samza (which
> > I think we should), they will need access to all the Samza APIs,
> including
> > reading and writing the key-value store and the like.
> >
> > Were you envisaging that such API calls could be made over a protocol
> that
> > uses stdout and stdin as its transport? I'm sure it can be done, but the
> > protocol would not be totally straightforward, as it would have to do
> > things like match a request from the child process (on stdout) with a
> > response to the API call (on stdin).
> >
> > Then there is a separate question of what transport the non-JVM process
> > uses to talk to the Samza container. stdout/stdin streams is an option,
> or
> > it could use Unix sockets, or TCP. Whatever method of transport is used,
> a
> > protocol will need to encode the Samza API calls in raw bytes.
> >
> > For reference, Storm uses a JSON-based protocol over stdin/stdout:
> > https://github.com/nathanmarz/storm/wiki/Multilang-protocol -- however,
> > it doesn't support all Storm features (
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-151).
> >
> > Martin
> >
> > On 10 Mar 2014, at 23:21, Jay Kreps <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > FWIW, I actually think the Hadoop streaming approach has some benefits.
> > It
> > > is less efficient then writing and embedding a C library but also much
> > much
> > > easier to implement and with less duplicate logic. I think we should be
> > > open to both of these--the streaming approach is so easy, it seems to
> me
> > > like there is not a huge downside to having that available.
> > >
> > > I think the mistake that Hadoop streaming might have made was
> > > over-simplifying the interaction with the client process. You probably
> > need
> > > a richer protocol than just the data (though I haven't thought this
> > > through).
> > >
> > > -Jay
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 12:26 PM, Jakob Homan <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hey Dave-
> > >>   Thanks for taking a look at Samza.  No one in the community is
> > currently
> > >> working on this at the moment, to our knowledge.  SAMZA-18 (
> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SAMZA-18) has the beginnings
> of a
> > >> discussion about creating a single C library to help provide
> > multilanguage
> > >> support in Samza (which I believe would be accessible to Go as well).
> > >> There's currently no JIRA for Hadoop-style streaming, but one could
> > >> certainly be created and it would be something we'd be interested in.
> > >> Thanks,
> > >> Jakob
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 12:19 PM, Dave Revell <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Hi all,
> > >>>
> > >>> We're considering using Samza for our high-throughput stream
> processing
> > >>> workload, but we don't want to rewrite all of our existing Go code.
> > We're
> > >>> considering writing something analogous to Hadoop Streaming, where
> the
> > >>> Samza consumer would start an external process and communicate with
> it
> > by
> > >>> passing protobufs via stdin/stdout. We like Samza's fault tolerance,
> > >> state
> > >>> management, and load balancing features and don't want to rewrite
> them.
> > >>>
> > >>> This possibility is mentioned in the documentation (
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> http://samza.incubator.apache.org/learn/documentation/0.7.0/comparisons/storm.html
> > >>> ,
> > >>> search for "stdin") as something that might exist some day. My
> > >>> questions
> > >>> are:
> > >>>
> > >>> 1. Is anyone working on this, or planning to? I couldn't find any
> > related
> > >>> JIRAs.
> > >>> 2. Any advice for implementing this? Are there any challenges that
> > might
> > >>> not be obvious?
> > >>> 3. Should we try to merge this upstream?
> > >>>
> > >>> Thanks a bunch,
> > >>> Dave
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to