> On Sept. 26, 2014, 8:13 p.m., Chris Riccomini wrote:
> > build.gradle, line 342
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/26059/diff/1/?file=705775#file705775line342>
> >
> >     Seems odd that samza-kv-leveldb depends on inmemory and rocksdb. Maybe 
> > Chinmay can comment.

This is an artifact of the TestKeyValueStores not being moved to samza-kv. This 
is tracked here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SAMZA-346


- Chinmay


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/26059/#review54718
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Sept. 25, 2014, 11:17 p.m., Naveen Somasundaram wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/26059/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Sept. 25, 2014, 11:17 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for samza.
> 
> 
> Bugs: SAMZA-236
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SAMZA-236
> 
> 
> Repository: samza
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Adding RocksDB Key-value support
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   build.gradle 357bb0e312c3812b55303847163f696f7c52ad78 
>   
> samza-kv-leveldb/src/test/scala/org/apache/samza/storage/kv/TestKeyValueStores.scala
>  d6d437ab7a8b18002dbeb54d85c6c2b5eb43784c 
>   
> samza-kv-rocksdb/src/main/scala/org/apache/samza/storage/kv/RocksDbKeyValueStorageEngineFactory.scala
>  PRE-CREATION 
>   
> samza-kv-rocksdb/src/main/scala/org/apache/samza/storage/kv/RocksDbKeyValueStore.scala
>  PRE-CREATION 
>   
> samza-kv-rocksdb/src/main/scala/org/apache/samza/storage/kv/TestRocksDbApi.scala
>  PRE-CREATION 
>   
> samza-test/src/main/scala/org/apache/samza/test/performance/TestKeyValuePerformance.scala
>  7d0b8db0c3bf1e70fd6af03abb594c7000e6666b 
>   settings.gradle 325cac27389093d87eb9e36d475e234ed52510ec 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/26059/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Unit testing
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Naveen Somasundaram
> 
>

Reply via email to