-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/26695/#review56713
-----------------------------------------------------------



samza-core/src/main/scala/org/apache/samza/config/ShellCommandConfig.scala
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/26695/#comment97110>

    "even the" -> "even when the"



samza-kafka/src/main/scala/org/apache/samza/util/KafkaLog4jAppender.scala
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/26695/#comment97095>

    License.
    
    Could we put this in the org.apache.samza.logging.log4j package space, the 
same way we have the jmx appender?



samza-kafka/src/main/scala/org/apache/samza/util/KafkaLog4jAppender.scala
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/26695/#comment97105>

    Get class name programmatically (Class[StringEncoder].getCanonicalName).



samza-kafka/src/main/scala/org/apache/samza/util/KafkaLog4jAppender.scala
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/26695/#comment97106>

    Get class name programmatically (Class[TaskIdPartitioner].getCanonicalName).



samza-kafka/src/main/scala/org/apache/samza/util/KafkaLog4jAppender.scala
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/26695/#comment97107>

    Nit: Whitespace.



samza-kafka/src/main/scala/org/apache/samza/util/KafkaLog4jAppender.scala
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/26695/#comment97108>

    Nit: Whitespace.



samza-kafka/src/main/scala/org/apache/samza/util/KafkaLog4jAppender.scala
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/26695/#comment97109>

    Define defaults in object object, and re-use here and in constructor above.



samza-kafka/src/main/scala/org/apache/samza/util/KafkaUtil.scala
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/26695/#comment97103>

    Should do validation here to make sure that the topic has the expected 
partition number and replication factor.
    
    See KafkaCheckpointManager.create and KafkaCheckpointManager.validate. 
Should consolidate that code here.



samza-kafka/src/main/scala/org/apache/samza/util/TaskIdPartitioner.scala
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/26695/#comment97093>

    License.
    
    Do we need this? I think Kafka's default partitioner 
(https://github.com/apache/kafka/blob/trunk/core/src/main/scala/kafka/producer/DefaultPartitioner.scala)
 will take care of this for us.



samza-kafka/src/main/scala/org/apache/samza/util/TaskIdPartitioner.scala
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/26695/#comment97094>

    Partitioner[space]{



samza-kafka/src/test/scala/org/apache/samza/util/TestKafkaUtil.scala
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/26695/#comment97100>

    License.


- Chris Riccomini


On Oct. 15, 2014, 4:49 p.m., Yan Fang wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/26695/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Oct. 15, 2014, 4:49 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for samza.
> 
> 
> Bugs: SAMZA-310
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SAMZA-310
> 
> 
> Repository: samza
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Publish the logs to the Kafka topic
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   docs/learn/documentation/versioned/jobs/logging.md 6739740 
>   samza-api/src/main/java/org/apache/samza/job/CommandBuilder.java f510ce5 
>   samza-core/src/main/scala/org/apache/samza/config/ShellCommandConfig.scala 
> 69cea2c 
>   samza-core/src/main/scala/org/apache/samza/job/ShellCommandBuilder.scala 
> 7519117 
>   samza-kafka/src/main/scala/org/apache/samza/util/KafkaLog4jAppender.scala 
> PRE-CREATION 
>   samza-kafka/src/main/scala/org/apache/samza/util/KafkaUtil.scala d660b91 
>   samza-kafka/src/main/scala/org/apache/samza/util/TaskIdPartitioner.scala 
> PRE-CREATION 
>   
> samza-kafka/src/test/scala/org/apache/samza/util/TestKafkaLog4jAppender.scala 
> PRE-CREATION 
>   samza-kafka/src/test/scala/org/apache/samza/util/TestKafkaUtil.scala 
> PRE-CREATION 
>   
> samza-yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/samza/job/yarn/SamzaAppMasterTaskManager.scala
>  5b6cc81 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/26695/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Yan Fang
> 
>

Reply via email to