I would prefer to chop the prefix too. Thanks. -- Subrata
-----Original Message----- From: Scott Cantor [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2010 10:49 AM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: C++ release candidate posted > My preference would be to chop the prefix off the headers if NSS can't > decide what its prefix is, but that won't work if I leave the configuration > to nss-config, so I'll have to ifdef it. Actually, I'm wrong, it looks like nss-config is returning the unprefixed path directly, so the right thing is to chop the prefix. I can try and add a couple of checks for where the includes are for non-packaged versions. -- Scott
