On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 3:07 PM, Cantor, Scott <[email protected]> wrote:
> > For clarification, do you mean really EOL'ing 1.5 (meaning even a security > issue wouldn't be addressed), or something less final? > I did mean EOL'ing 1.5. I'm a bit sick of having to keep JDK 1.5 around to compile old projects ;-) However, I'm prepared to be flexible on this, so given the OpenSAML 2 dependency I will leave the 1.5.9 release until next year, unless a security issue or major bug crops up in the meantime. Is this acceptable for you? Colm. > If there was advance notice that this was coming, that's my fault for > missing it. We're supporting the OpenSAML 2 code base until next July, and > it depends on 1.x right now. We just need to know if we need to budget for > moving it to 2.x. > > -- Scott > > -- Colm O hEigeartaigh Talend Community Coder http://coders.talend.com
