Leonard Mada wrote:
I wish to mention the following 3 issues:
1. compiling and testing the new algorithm
2. "void ScInterpreter::ScCorrel()" AND "void
ScInterpreter::ScPearson()" seem to be identical
-- I have found NO difference in the documentation for CORREL() and
PEARSON(), but I may have overlooked something
-- IF they are truly identical, than calling within ::ScPearson() the
ScCorrel() function would be OK
-- NO need to maintain 2 times an identical code
No, you're right. That should be unified. Well spotted.
3. other functions seem/are broken, like "void ScInterpreter::ScCovar()"
AND "void ScInterpreter::ScRSQ()",...
-- would need to be fixed, too
Sure. Most of them are still the initial implementation. Only a few
functions have ever been updated.
Ok, then everything is fine. Can somebody compile this? I do not really
know how to (or have the utilities to) compile it. Before integrating
this into an official OOo, I believe it should be extensively tested.
OOo can now be built on Windows using only free tools. Noel just posted
something at
http://noelpower.blogs.ie/2006/11/10/hurray-now-you-can-build-with-free-compiler-on-windows/.
I haven't tried it myself, though.
Is it possible to compile only a dll so that I have only to replace one
file in my official OOo. (I have NO idea if this file gets compiled as a
separate dll, but that would be really helpful.)
Built-in functions are in the main Calc dll, sc680mi.dll on Windows.
Niklas
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
