I removed the release from the report. I’ll also start that conversation regarding release 0.4.5a56. Thanks again!
Stepheny From: Julian Hyde <jhyde.apa...@gmail.com> Date: Wednesday, November 2, 2022 at 1:20 PM To: dev@sdap.apache.org <dev@sdap.apache.org> Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] November Apache SDAP report draft It’s not a release for Apache’s purposes because it hasn’t been through the signing/vote/publish/announce process. An Apache release is a legal and community action more than it is a piece of code. The software quality of the release (e.g. ‘alpha’) is irrelevant to Apache, but the process of creating the release is all-important. Yes, I think you should remove the release from the report. If you do that I’ll amend my comments. I am happy to work with SDAP committers on an Apache-style release. We can probably use the 0.4.5a56 tag as a starting point. A good starting point would be an email to the dev list with the subject “[DISCUSS] Towards release 0.4.5a56” asking when would be a good time for a release, volunteer for release manager, agree on a list of tasks, etc. Julian > On Nov 2, 2022, at 11:38 AM, Perez, Stepheny K (US 398F) > <stepheny.k.pe...@jpl.nasa.gov.INVALID> wrote: > > Julian, > > The release I was referring to in our report was 0.4.5a56 which is an alpha > release. Would specifying this in the report make it more accurate? If not, I > can remove that from the report altogether. Thanks for your feedback. > > Stepheny > > From: Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org> > Date: Wednesday, November 2, 2022 at 11:22 AM > To: dev@sdap.apache.org <dev@sdap.apache.org> > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: November Apache SDAP report draft > Thanks for writing and submitting the report, Stepheny. > > I signed off and made the following comments: > >> The report says that there has been a release. I dispute >> that. There is no release vote on dev@, no mention of the >> release on dev@, nothing on announce@, and no downloads page. >> >> As far as I can tell, this project has never made an Apache >> release. >> >> SDAP's number 1 problem is their use of dev@. There is activity >> in the project (including commit messages going to dev@) but >> questions asked on dev@ go unanswered, and therefore >> conversations don't happen. Even the report is drafted on >> private@ rather than dev@. I think I can work with SDAP and get >> them to graduate but only if they engage on dev@. >> >> I have given notice that I will resign as a mentor by Dec 31st if >> I don't see activity, namely a plan to graduate, and activity to >> carry out that plan. > > Julian > > > On 2022/11/02 00:57:44 "Perez, Stepheny K (US 398F)" wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Attached you will find a draft of the November 2022 Apache SDAP report. In >> this report, I’ve included details about what steps we still need to take >> before graduating and a target date for graduating. Please provide feedback >> on the contents, as I’ll be submitting the reporting today at C.O.B. >> >> Thank you! >> Stepheny >> >>