They are implicitly binding iff the voter is a PPMC member. Saying “(binding)” is just a courtesy to the RM.
When announcing the result the RM should distinguish binding from non- binding votes. Non-binding votes don’t “count” but can alert the PPMC to problems and so are worth taking seriously. Julian > On Dec 22, 2022, at 10:15, Riley Kuttruff <r...@apache.org> wrote: > > Julian, > > Are PPMC votes implicitly binding or does it need to be explicitly stated? > > Riley > >> On 2022/12/22 17:27:09 Julian Hyde wrote: >> Thomas, (and others on this thread), it is helpful if you provide rationale >> for your vote. What steps did you take to verify the release? Did you >> encounter any matters of concern? >> >> Julian >> >>>> On Dec 21, 2022, at 3:05 PM, Thomas G Loubrieu <tloubr...@apache.org> >>>> wrote: >>> >>> +1 >>> >>>> On 2022/12/20 16:12:07 Julian Hyde wrote: >>>> If NASA has contributed these files to SDAP we’re fine. >>>> >>>> Julian >>>> >>>>>> On Dec 19, 2022, at 5:51 PM, Stepheny Perez <skpe...@apache.org> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi Julian, >>>>> >>>>> Those are test files, some are custom but some aren’t. For example >>>>> 20181231090000-JPL-L4_GHRSST-SSTfnd-MUR25-GLOB-v02.0-fv04.2.nc is a >>>>> publicly accessible NASA file. Would you advise us to remove these? >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Stepheny >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> On 2022/12/20 00:17:00 Julian Hyde wrote: >>>>>> The vote email is much improved; thank you! >>>>>> >>>>>> I downloaded the artifacts using svn, checked signatures (.asc files), >>>>>> LICENSE, NOTICE, DISCLAIMER, VERSION.txt, file headers; I verified >>>>>> that the contents of each tar file matches the corresponding git >>>>>> commit. Checked for binary files. >>>>>> >>>>>> I see that hashes of the src.tar.gz files have changed since the >>>>>> previous rc2 vote, and they are signed with your key rather than Nga's >>>>>> key. That's OK. >>>>>> >>>>>> I see that sdap-ingester contains some large binary files with .nc, >>>>>> .h5 and .nc4 suffixes. Are those files covered by the Apache license? >>>>>> Are they generated? (It's OK to include binary files in a release, >>>>>> provided that the project owns the copyright, but not OK to include >>>>>> generated files.) I am going to assume that they are owned by the >>>>>> project and not generated; please let me know if I am mistaken. >>>>>> >>>>>> +1 (binding) >>>>>> >>>>>> Julian >>>>>> >>>>>> PS Riley: Yes, you definitely can vote. RMs usually add the following >>>>>> line to their vote emails: "Here's my vote: +1 (binding)". >>>>>> >>>>>> PPS Since we have one only one active mentor, I am going to ask other >>>>>> IPMC members to take a look at these artifacts and vote. Even if they >>>>>> discover problems that I have not, it will still help us get to a good >>>>>> release faster. >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 11:17 AM Riley Kuttruff <r...@apache.org> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> +1 from me too if I can. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Riley >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 2022/12/19 19:05:43 Stepheny Perez wrote: >>>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Stepheny >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 2022/12/19 18:58:47 Riley Kuttruff wrote: >>>>>>>>> Hello everyone, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> This is the second attempt to approve Apache SDAP (incubating) >>>>>>>>> release candidate rc2 for version 1.0.0. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> There were no changes to the code between this and the previous >>>>>>>>> attempt to release rc2. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Changes made between previous candidate (rc1) and this one (rc2) are >>>>>>>>> as >>>>>>>>> follows: >>>>>>>>> - Added README >>>>>>>>> - Added DISCLAIMER >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Instructions for building docker images from source can be found here: >>>>>>>>> https://incubator-sdap-nexus.readthedocs.io/en/latest/build.html >>>>>>>>> Instructions for deploying locally to test can be found here: >>>>>>>>> https://incubator-sdap-nexus.readthedocs.io/en/latest/quickstart.html >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The tags to be voted on are 1.0.0-rc2: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> - nexusproto: >>>>>>>>> - URL: >>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-sdap-nexusproto/tree/1.0.0-rc2 >>>>>>>>> - Commit: f3c726e69997436dd9ee6f9a993d4c95ee490b6f >>>>>>>>> - ingester: >>>>>>>>> - URL: >>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-sdap-ingester/tree/1.0.0-rc2 >>>>>>>>> - Commit: 2c8a9d35320f11a5db2534802f43366ddaff2fea >>>>>>>>> - nexus: >>>>>>>>> - URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-sdap-nexus/tree/1.0.0-rc2 >>>>>>>>> - Commit: f60e98331ac29b57ca40322f8f96e98a5c69e553 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The release files, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found >>>>>>>>> at: >>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/sdap/apache-sdap-1.0.0-rc2/ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> For verification, the hashes (SHA-512) of the .tar.gz artifacts we >>>>>>>>> are voting on are as follows: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> apache-sdap-ingester-1.0.0-src.tar.gz: >>>>>>>>> db380c3002351e65ec3581a3ff0cacbb7092f46292b0a656a78a919e1409738442e845731050a2160a556a7818f22b2ab4bb6da437200bc0a62419332de49ad7 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> apache-sdap-nexus-1.0.0-src.tar.gz: >>>>>>>>> da34e9830cf5126bac498180d7cdd95bc2cfc13535c7b4355ba51de64e3589a385a969e0cf1a89fa77e436b30c99a48abffab4b4ef03b23982aa33c2e83e8dbd >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> apache-sdap-nexusproto-1.0.0-src.tar.gz: >>>>>>>>> 05dc8e96d9c49207750c1da13f630493e8d08f5e68733742c157ac6c85ede29aca25f3c94cd706acbbe21cee41ebc052a880b4d6ce859bf510bcc2d66d8f88b2 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Release artifacts are signed with the following key: >>>>>>>>> https://keyserver.ubuntu.com/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x4e98c4a32026656e14e0b570fc20035a010e3b7b >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache SDAP (incubating) >>>>>>>>> 1.0.0. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The vote is open for 72 hours and passes if at least 3 +1 PMC votes >>>>>>>>> are >>>>>>>>> cast. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> PLEASE NOTE: Do not reply with a vote from your work email as it can >>>>>>>>> mangle the links. To vote, go to >>>>>>>>> https://lists.apache.org/list.html?dev@sdap.apache.org, log in and >>>>>>>>> send your reply from there. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache SDAP (incubating) 1.0.0 >>>>>>>>> [ ] +0 No opinion >>>>>>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ... >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thank you, >>>>>>>>> Riley >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>
