Yes, Because the release binary packages don't contain connectors v2, So we
don't need to pay attention to relevant licenses.

Jared <[email protected]> 于2022年7月13日周三 03:49写道:

> It's a good idea to separate SeaTunnel core and connectors when
> release.&nbsp;
>
>
> But There is a question:
> Don't we need to sort out the licenses of third-party jars&nbsp;when
> develop new connector ?
>
>
> Jared
> [email protected]
>
>
>
> &nbsp;
>
>
>
>
> ------------------&nbsp;原始邮件&nbsp;------------------
> 发件人:
>                                                   "dev"
>                                                                 <
> [email protected]&gt;;
> 发送时间:&nbsp;2022年7月12日(星期二) 下午3:02
> 收件人:&nbsp;"dev"<[email protected]&gt;;
>
> 主题:&nbsp;[proposal] ConnectorV2 no longer provides binary packages
>
>
>
> Hi, everyone.
>
> Because seatunnel connectors are developed independently, each connector
> needs to rely on a large number of third-party jar packages, and
> contributors need to spend a lot of energy to sort out the licenses of
> these third-party jars, which brings great difficulties to the development
> of connector. Therefore, I propose that the binary package of the new
> connector will not be released at the same time when seatunnel is released,
> which can improve the time of connector development.
>
>
> We use Maven profiles to control the build process. By default, all modules
> will be built. When we check-dependency in CI or release project, we can
> set e2e, examples, connectors-v2, connectors-v2-dist,dependency-shade not
> to build through "-P release"
>
>
> We recommend that users compile their own seatunnel connector.
>
> --
>
> Best Regards
>
> ------------
>
> EricJoy2048
> [email protected]



-- 

Best Regards

------------

EricJoy2048
[email protected]

Reply via email to