+1

Agree with you

TaoZex <[email protected]> 于2023年7月22日周六 13:37写道:

> Agree with you. We should also consider what metadata information is
> necessary to count in the catalog.
>
>
> Best Regards
> TaoZex
> ------------------&nbsp;原始邮件&nbsp;------------------
> 发件人:
>                                                   "dev"
>                                                                 <
> [email protected]&gt;;
> 发送时间:&nbsp;2023年7月22日(星期六) 上午10:17
> 收件人:&nbsp;"dev"<[email protected]&gt;;
>
> 主题:&nbsp;[Proposal] Spark&amp;Flink compatible catalog
>
>
>
> *background*
>
> Due to the existence of commercial versions and open source web, it is
> necessary to clearly know the data source table and the table structure
> processed by each node when defining tasks. So the entire architecture
> layer needs to use a catalog approach, and the previous description of
> SeaTunnelRowType cannot meet the synchronization requirements.
> At present, the Zeta engine has supported the creation of connectors using
> the catalog method, but spark/link still uses the SeaTunnelRowType
> interface, which requires the connector to implement both the Catalog and
> SeaTunnelRowType interfaces in order to execute on different engines. This
> will require a lot of work and is meaningless.
> To solve this problem, we need spark/link to first support the Catalog
> method, so that the new connector can only implement the Catalog interface,
> while the old connector can gradually remove the SeaTunnelRowType
> interface.
>
> --
>
> Best Regards
>
> ------------
>
> EricJoy2048
> [email protected]

Reply via email to