Thanks Jia Fan for your very informative response. Thanks & Regards Mohammad Arshad
From: Jia Fan <[email protected]> Date: Monday, 19 August 2024 at 3:10 PM To: [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Seatunnel-Engine(Zeta) Stability. Hi Mohammad Arshad. > How the community is using Zeta. is there any alternate way to have Kerberos and SSL? Currently, the community does not have a corresponding solution, which will be developed later. > is anybody using zeta engine in enterprise level deployment? if yes, how they are managing the security? You can restrict access to the port or define a complex cluster-name to prevent other nodes from joining the cluster. Or try limit node by https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdocs.hazelcast.com%2Fhazelcast%2F5.1%2Fclusters%2Fdiscovering-by-tcp&data=05%7C02%7Cmohammad.arshad%40visa.com%7C9be9dd7c45ac487c025b08dcc0330494%7C38305e12e15d4ee888b9c4db1c477d76%7C0%7C0%7C638596572565542841%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=9IDtswpVFn8GV4w%2Buej9M%2FOJoHKlbpvx0KURrfy2Djc%3D&reserved=0<https://docs.hazelcast.com/hazelcast/5.1/clusters/discovering-by-tcp> and https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdocs.hazelcast.com%2Fhazelcast%2F5.1%2Fclusters%2Fdiscovering-native-clients&data=05%7C02%7Cmohammad.arshad%40visa.com%7C9be9dd7c45ac487c025b08dcc0330494%7C38305e12e15d4ee888b9c4db1c477d76%7C0%7C0%7C638596572565554891%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=tdoov2g%2FfGcj%2BY%2FJXaERoFKt%2FvrqIqoVnn6ORabiZX0%3D&reserved=0<https://docs.hazelcast.com/hazelcast/5.1/clusters/discovering-native-clients> > is there any issue of stability with Hazelcast community edition? No serious problems have been found so far Arshad, Mohammad <[email protected]> 于2024年8月19日周一 17:12写道： > Hi All > Seatunnel-engine(Zeta) relies extensively on community edition Hazelcast, > which however, missing some basic features such as Kerberos authentication > and SSL and many other features > Reference: > https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fhazelcast.com%2Fproducts%2Ffeature-comparison%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cmohammad.arshad%40visa.com%7C9be9dd7c45ac487c025b08dcc0330494%7C38305e12e15d4ee888b9c4db1c477d76%7C0%7C0%7C638596572565562917%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=OMY0iuF0%2FW238iFmDOF%2F4LAj7K%2FX%2BOxHf9O1EWIRCVs%3D&reserved=0<https://hazelcast.com/products/feature-comparison/> > > How the community is using Zeta. is there any alternate way to have > Kerberos and SSL? > is anybody using zeta engine in enterprise level deployment? if yes, how > they are managing the security? > is there any issue of stability with Hazelcast community edition? > > Thanks & Regards > Mohammad Arshad > >
