[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SEDONA-179?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17618176#comment-17618176
]
Jia Yu commented on SEDONA-179:
-------------------------------
Thank you for the suggestion! I will take a look into this. I think the license
is fine. But the SFC test suite seems to be comprehensive. Some functions are
lack in Sedona (like the complete support for M and many different geometry
types, PolyhedralSurface, Surface, Curve). This will take lots of efforts. I
will need to find some dedicated manpower on this and will keep the community
posted.
> Claim Open Geospatial Consortium compliance
> -------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SEDONA-179
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SEDONA-179
> Project: Apache Sedona
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Martin Andersson
> Priority: Major
>
> Sedona is mature enough now that it should be able to claim compliance with
> OGC sql standards. OGC has a test suite (see annex A-C in the linked
> document). If Sedona would implement those tests as unit tests and make them
> pass, Sedona should be able to claim compliance.
> Adding those tests would be a good way to catch defects and regressions.
> Claiming compliance would hopefully increase trust in Sedona and increase
> adoption.
> There is a license on the first page. I looks very liberal to me. But I don't
> speak legal. Would this have to be cleared be Apache legal first?
> https://www.ogc.org/standards/sfs
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
