Hi Jia, I believe that it should be fine to have multiple staging repositories, as long as all the packages we plan to release are covered by these staging repositories.
I suggest that we push the following packages to one staging repository: * sedona-parent * sedona-common * sedona-spark-parent-(3.4 and 3.5) * sedona-spark-common-(3.4 and 3.5) * sedona-spark-(3.4 and 3.5) * sedona-spark-shaded-(3.4 and 3.5) * sedona-flink_2.12 * sedona-flink-shaded_2.12 * sedona-snowflake And push spark-4.0 related packages to another staging repository: * sedona-spark-parent-4.0_2.13 * sedona-spark-common-4.0_2.13 * sedona-spark-4.0_2.13 * sedona-spark-shaded-4.0_2.12 We can close and release both staging repositories after the vote is passed. Kristin On Tue, Sep 9, 2025 at 3:03 AM Jia Yu <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Kristin, > > Thanks for capturing this. Aside from the Snowflake and Flink issue, I also > noticed the 2-staging repo problem. I think this is because I published the > Spark 3.4 and 3.5 version using maven + Java 11, then published the rest > using maven + Java 17 (Spark 4.0 using Java 17). > > Do you think this is ok or is there a better way to solve this? > > Jia > > > > On Mon, Sep 8, 2025 at 4:01 AM Kristin Cowalcijk <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Hi Jia. > > > > Thank you for driving the release process. The regular checks in the > > release verification notebook are all green. However, I found that the > > Apache Maven staging repository does not contain all the packages. The > > staging repositories I checked are: > > > > * > > > > > https://repository.apache.org/service/local/repositories/orgapachesedona-1050/content/org/apache/sedona/ > > * > > > > > https://repository.apache.org/service/local/repositories/orgapachesedona-1051/content/org/apache/sedona/ > > > > The sedona-parent, sedona-common, flink and snowflake packages are > missing > > in the above repositories. Directly closing and releasing these staging > > repositories could be problematic. > > > > The following are regular checks required by the release process: > > > > I checked: > > * Download links are valid > > * Checksums and PGP signatures are valid > > * NOTICE is included > > * Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release > > * The project can compile from the source code > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 8, 2025 at 4:47 PM Jia Yu <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > This is a call for vote on Apache Sedona 1.8.0-rc1. Please refer to the > > > changes listed at the bottom of this email. > > > > > > Release notes: > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/sedona/blob/sedona-1.8.0-rc1/docs/setup/release-notes.md > > > > > > Build instructions: > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/sedona/blob/sedona-1.8.0-rc1/docs/setup/compile.md > > > > > > GitHub tag: > > > https://github.com/apache/sedona/releases/tag/sedona-1.8.0-rc1 > > > > > > GPG public key to verify the Release: > > > https://downloads.apache.org/sedona/KEYS > > > > > > Source code and binaries: > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/sedona/1.8.0-rc1/ > > > > > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until at least 3 "+1" > PMC > > > votes are cast > > > > > > Instruction for checking items on the checklist: > > > https://sedona.apache.org/latest/community/vote/ > > > > > > We recommend you use this Jupyter notebook on MyBinder to perform this > > > task: > > > > > > > > > https://mybinder.org/v2/gh/jiayuasu/sedona-tools/HEAD?labpath=binder%2Fverify-release.ipynb > > > > > > **Please vote accordingly and you must provide your checklist for your > > > vote**. > > > > > > > > > [ ] +1 approve > > > > > > [ ] +0 no opinion > > > > > > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason > > > > > > Checklist: > > > > > > [ ] Download links are valid. > > > > > > [ ] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid. > > > > > > [ ] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current > > release. > > > > > > For a detailed checklist please refer to: > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/Incubator+Release+Checklist > > > > > > ------------ > > > > > > Changes according to the comments on the previous release > > > Original comment (Permalink from https://lists.apache.org/list.html): > > > > > >
