Hi Sedona community,

I’ve recently started exploring Apache Sedona and have been looking
into its support for Boolean spatial predicates such as ST_Contains,
ST_Intersects, and ST_Within across different APIs (SQL and PySpark in
particular).

While going through the documentation and trying out a few examples, I
became curious about the consistency of these predicates in terms of:

1. Behavior across APIs (SQL vs PySpark/Scala)
2. Handling of edge cases (e.g., boundary-touching geometries, empty
or invalid geometries)
3. Alignment with standards such as PostGIS / OGC definitions

I wanted to ask:
Are there any known gaps, inconsistencies, or ongoing efforts in this
area where contributions would be useful?

I’m particularly interested in contributing toward improving API
consistency, test coverage for edge cases, or documentation clarity if
that aligns with current priorities.

Any pointers or guidance would be really helpful.

Thanks for your time!

Reply via email to