> On May 10, 2016, 7:12 a.m., Dapeng Sun wrote:
> > Thank Ashish for your contribution!

Thanks for the review Dapeng! Mind giving it another pass?


> On May 10, 2016, 7:12 a.m., Dapeng Sun wrote:
> > sentry-provider/sentry-provider-db/src/main/java/org/apache/sentry/provider/db/generic/tools/KafkaTSentryPrivilegeConvertor.java,
> >  line 55
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/47075/diff/1/?file=1374985#file1374985line55>
> >
> >     Do we need to test if we covered the case, likes 
> > "CLUSTER=kafka-cluster->HOST=*->action=write" which resource type is in 
> > front of HOST?

It is covered in testNegativeCaseWithInvalidArgument. In case you are referring 
to some other scenario let me know.


- Ashish


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/47075/#review132383
-----------------------------------------------------------


On May 6, 2016, 5:54 p.m., Ashish Singh wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/47075/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated May 6, 2016, 5:54 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for sentry, Colin Ma and Dapeng Sun.
> 
> 
> Bugs: SENTRY-1208
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SENTRY-1208
> 
> 
> Repository: sentry
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> SENTRY-1208: Make HOST implied in privileges if not specified explicitly.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> sentry-provider/sentry-provider-db/src/main/java/org/apache/sentry/provider/db/generic/tools/KafkaTSentryPrivilegeConvertor.java
>  af73755ae92ad4f61243d18b2521d144189532b4 
>   
> sentry-provider/sentry-provider-db/src/test/java/org/apache/sentry/provider/db/generic/tools/TestSentryShellKafka.java
>  d49bc57b5c0b619e5e0e34fcf1f2676535c9e13c 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/47075/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Extended existing unit tests.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Ashish Singh
> 
>

Reply via email to