-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/58284/#review171443
-----------------------------------------------------------




sentry-hdfs/sentry-hdfs-common/src/main/java/org/apache/sentry/hdfs/FullUpdateInitializer.java
Lines 220 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/58284/#comment244379>

    can we log the number of retires in this warning message?



sentry-hdfs/sentry-hdfs-common/src/main/java/org/apache/sentry/hdfs/FullUpdateInitializer.java
Line 128 (original), 221 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/58284/#comment244377>

    should retries = i + 1?



sentry-hdfs/sentry-hdfs-common/src/main/java/org/apache/sentry/hdfs/FullUpdateInitializer.java
Line 129 (original), 222 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/58284/#comment244378>

    should we use "break" to get out of the for() loop instead of setting "i = 
retryStrategyMaxRetries;"? In current implementation, the line 226 "retries = 
i;" will be called when InterruptedException  is called, then "retries" will be 
set as "retryStrategyMaxRetries". That is not correct



sentry-hdfs/sentry-hdfs-common/src/test/java/org/apache/sentry/hdfs/TestFullUpdateInitializer.java
Line 125 (original), 214 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/58284/#comment244380>

    can we have the test case that the first time, client returns exception, 
but the second time, it returns correct result. This is to test the retry 
behavior.


- Na Li


On April 10, 2017, 5:42 a.m., Alexander Kolbasov wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/58284/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated April 10, 2017, 5:42 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for sentry, Hao Hao, kalyan kumar kalvagadda, Na Li, Sergio 
> Pena, Vamsee Yarlagadda, and Vadim Spector.
> 
> 
> Bugs: SENTRY-1687
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SENTRY-1687
> 
> 
> Repository: sentry
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> SENTRY-1687 FullUpdateInitializer can be more efficient
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> sentry-hdfs/sentry-hdfs-common/src/main/java/org/apache/sentry/hdfs/FullUpdateInitializer.java
>  90aaaef0e15306627d7108f12a74a29848055c0b 
>   
> sentry-hdfs/sentry-hdfs-common/src/main/java/org/apache/sentry/hdfs/PathsUpdate.java
>  14e967aa1065f16e8d4c3f61db2f9055959fa9e6 
>   
> sentry-hdfs/sentry-hdfs-common/src/main/java/org/apache/sentry/hdfs/ServiceConstants.java
>  23552c2512902a8500bfacb1c745ca4b10498cc8 
>   
> sentry-hdfs/sentry-hdfs-common/src/test/java/org/apache/sentry/hdfs/TestFullUpdateInitializer.java
>  f338ce8abddcde128536a0efef77983990325aa6 
>   
> sentry-hdfs/sentry-hdfs-common/src/test/java/org/apache/sentry/hdfs/TestPathsUpdate.java
>  b5cbea9d295385bb38b912c13903edace04d7589 
>   
> sentry-hdfs/sentry-hdfs-common/src/test/java/org/apache/sentry/hdfs/TestUpdateableAuthzPaths.java
>  e643e01a45de77ef7f465d6921c5ae9e7ce925a2 
>   
> sentry-provider/sentry-provider-db/src/main/java/org/apache/sentry/service/thrift/HMSFollower.java
>  16676fb13b0d5015aefe892a6f7e46812ea75124 
>   
> sentry-tests/sentry-tests-hive/src/test/java/org/apache/sentry/tests/e2e/hdfs/TestHDFSIntegrationAdvanced.java
>  24ab1a8b392f23bc75759733bef7cecd4bc2ac34 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/58284/diff/1/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Updated the unit test to test for bigger HMS snapshots
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Alexander Kolbasov
> 
>

Reply via email to