> On April 6, 2017, 12:41 a.m., Hao Hao wrote:
> > sentry-provider/sentry-provider-db/src/main/resources/sentry-upgrade-mysql-1.7.0-to-1.8.0.sql
> > Lines 5 (patched)
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/58164/diff/4/?file=1685758#file1685758line5>
> >
> >     Am I missing something? why is still using 008-xxx here? :) Also, again 
> > same as Sasha pointed out, I would prefer not to usea seperate sql script 
> > file to update the new table no one is using yet.
> >     
> >     BTW, did you get a chance to verify those changes?

I have tested it against all 5 databases that sentry offically suppports.


- kalyan kumar


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/58164/#review171184
-----------------------------------------------------------


On April 7, 2017, 9:56 p.m., kalyan kumar kalvagadda wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/58164/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated April 7, 2017, 9:56 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for sentry, Alexander Kolbasov, Hao Hao, and Na Li.
> 
> 
> Bugs: SENTRY-1638
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SENTRY-1638
> 
> 
> Repository: sentry
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> UpdateD SQL script of MSentryPathChange table to add a column for 
> notification ID.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> sentry-provider/sentry-provider-db/src/main/java/org/apache/sentry/provider/db/service/model/package.jdo
>  e981bcf0f327346c09cdbe5785fb8824fc62e704 
>   
> sentry-provider/sentry-provider-db/src/main/resources/007-SENTRY-1365.mysql.sql
>  1829e2fa1f02a4339e7af4bf45a169013e9ec65f 
>   
> sentry-provider/sentry-provider-db/src/main/resources/008-SENTRY-1569.derby.sql
>  84b7903857ba51badde8a769eae86219eeaf3dab 
>   
> sentry-provider/sentry-provider-db/src/main/resources/008-SENTRY-1569.mysql.sql
>  69865508103bb8b1dd6148aa48c616d4b683614f 
>   
> sentry-provider/sentry-provider-db/src/main/resources/008-SENTRY-1569.oracle.sql
>  6a438ea847619af4d4d99d0fb99e036e55bf425f 
>   
> sentry-provider/sentry-provider-db/src/main/resources/008-SENTRY-1569.postgres.sql
>  a9b7e2c48bb86bc0a81fad00d27387e26ef18c28 
>   sentry-provider/sentry-provider-db/src/main/resources/sentry-db2-1.8.0.sql 
> 547bbe8136186658e7fe76ab24934157ea5300ff 
>   
> sentry-provider/sentry-provider-db/src/main/resources/sentry-derby-1.8.0.sql 
> 6474389a18ea59da28d3d7125cf227c7aaa7f7aa 
>   
> sentry-provider/sentry-provider-db/src/main/resources/sentry-mysql-1.8.0.sql 
> 1ab83432db233ee4e7aa054adc1b82c26248a099 
>   
> sentry-provider/sentry-provider-db/src/main/resources/sentry-oracle-1.8.0.sql 
> 0418b298f7cbd8f430733cb329e9fca263bda0f7 
>   
> sentry-provider/sentry-provider-db/src/main/resources/sentry-postgres-1.8.0.sql
>  68d2c8d53d7c468269ca2c41986ef8651b94f5c7 
>   
> sentry-provider/sentry-provider-db/src/main/resources/sentry-upgrade-db2-1.7.0-to-1.8.0.sql
>  5376c166659b3e8e373c8c20818f5b1290af90c9 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/58164/diff/7/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> I have tested it against derby, oracle, postgres, mysql and db2.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> kalyan kumar kalvagadda
> 
>

Reply via email to