Yes, There is been work going on.They are expected to be 1.8.0. There will be patches submitted for these jira's soon.
-Kalyan On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 6:50 AM, Colm O hEigeartaigh <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks. Is there any work ongoing for these issues? Is it expected to be > done for 1.8.0? > > Colm. > > On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 12:46 PM, Kalyan Kumar Kalvagadda < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Hello Colm, >> >> Here are the jira's for the same. >> >> SENTRY-1475 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SENTRY-1475> >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SENTRY-1475> >> SENTRY-1117 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SENTRY-1117> >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SENTRY-1117> >> SENTRY-1480 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SENTRY-1480> >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SENTRY-1480> >> >> >> -Kalyan >> >> On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 3:43 AM, Colm O hEigeartaigh <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi Kalyan, >>> >>> That's great! Where is the work being done? Is there a JIRA to track it? >>> >>> Colm. >>> >>> On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 10:31 PM, Kalyan Kumar Kalvagadda < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> > Colm, >>> > >>> > There is work under progress to integrate sentry with the new >>> Authorization >>> > framework in Solr. >>> > >>> > -Kalyan >>> > >>> > On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 3:47 PM, Alexander Kolbasov < >>> [email protected]> >>> > wrote: >>> > >>> > > Are there any Solr people here who can comment? Should we ping >>> someone >>> > from >>> > > Solr? >>> > > >>> > > On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 9:36 AM, Colm O hEigeartaigh < >>> > [email protected]> >>> > > wrote: >>> > > >>> > > > As a corollary of this question, I don't believe the Sentry Solr >>> code >>> > > will >>> > > > work with any version of Solr post 4.10.x. As Solr is currently on >>> > > 6.6.0, I >>> > > > wonder what the point is of keeping this code in future releases >>> unless >>> > > it >>> > > > is updated to work with a more current version of Solr? >>> > > > >>> > > > Colm. >>> > > > >>> > > > On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 11:18 AM, Colm O hEigeartaigh < >>> > > [email protected] >>> > > > > >>> > > > wrote: >>> > > > >>> > > > > Hi all, >>> > > > > >>> > > > > Is there a reason we don't offer an implementation of the Solr >>> > > > > AuthorizationPlugin? >>> > > > > >>> > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Rule- >>> > > > > Based+Authorization+Plugin >>> > > > > >>> > > > > Enabling Sentry authorization would then be a simple matter of >>> > > specifying >>> > > > > the plugin in the authorization part of the security.json. This >>> is >>> > the >>> > > > > approach Apache Ranger follows. >>> > > > > >>> > > > > Colm. >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > -- >>> > > > > Colm O hEigeartaigh >>> > > > > >>> > > > > Talend Community Coder >>> > > > > http://coders.talend.com >>> > > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > -- >>> > > > Colm O hEigeartaigh >>> > > > >>> > > > Talend Community Coder >>> > > > http://coders.talend.com >>> > > > >>> > > >>> > >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Colm O hEigeartaigh >>> >>> Talend Community Coder >>> http://coders.talend.com >>> >> >> > > > -- > Colm O hEigeartaigh > > Talend Community Coder > http://coders.talend.com >
