Lina - would it make sense to create uber-JIRA for ULP, mark it with
"roadmap" keyword and start putting some of these as subtasks?

On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 11:35 AM, Na Li <lina...@cloudera.com> wrote:

> Sasha,
>
> The current user-based privilege missed some items:
>
>
>    - Sentry policy has two service API: SentryPolicyService
>    and SentryGenericPolicyService. The current implementation does not
> support
>    user-based privilege for SentryGenericPolicyService
>    - SENTRY-2091: User-based Privilege is broken by SENTRY-769. The patch
>    is available for review.
>    - Name Node need change to generate ACL using user privilege.
>       - The full snapshot update only contains authorization to roles
>       mapping and role to group mapping. *Need to add role to user mapping
>       in* SentryStore.retrieveFullRoleImageCore
>       - The delta updates are taken from table SENTRY_PERM_CHANGE, which
>       does not distinguish group based permission or user based
> permission. No
>       change is needed
>       - The user changes to a role is not included when sending delta
>       update from Sentry to NN. *Need to add AddUsers and DropUsers
>       in TRoleChanges*.
>       - Sentry only create ACL for group with ACL type
>       as AclEntryType.GROUP. *Need to add code to create ACL with type as *
>       AclEntryType.USER
>       - SentryINodeAttributesProvider.checkPermission
>          -> FSPermissionChecker.checkPermission
>          -> SentryINodeAttributesProvider.getAclFeature
>          -> SentryAuthorizationInfo.getAclEntries
>          -> SentryPermissions.constructAclEntry
>       - SentryStore.grantOptionCheck() has to be changed to find user level
>    privilege.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Lina
>
> On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 1:13 PM, Sergio Pena <sergio.p...@cloudera.com>
> wrote:
>
> > There is a section on the Wiki about roadmap ideas and JIRAs already
> > created:
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SENTRY/
> > Sentry+Roadmap+and+ideas
> >
> > I'm interested in having user-level privileges and special user
> privileges
> > for objects owners.
> >
> > I got this from the linked above:
> >   SENTRY-1073 User who creates a table should be granted all privileges
> on
> > it by default
> >   SENTRY-1068 Allow user who created a table to have "with grant" over
> that
> > table by default
> >   Creator of a table should have ownership of it (all privileges)
> >   Allow privileges to be granted to users directly
> >
> > We should start planning the next Sentry 2.1 release based on the desired
> > features. What about
> > having 2 or 3 features on Sentry 2.1?
> >
> > I vote for:
> > - user-level privileges (currently grant user to role is only supported)
> > - default user privileges for objects owners
> >
> > Should we start a vote for new features for 2.1?
> >
> > - Sergio
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 12:46 PM, Kalyan Kumar Kalvagadda <
> > kkal...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> >
> > > I would like to add something here.
> > >
> > >
> > >    1. Current support for user-based-privileges allows admin to grant a
> > >    role to user. Ideally, user-based-privileges feature should be
> > allowing
> > >    administrator to grant privileges to individual users directly.
> > >       -  I'm working on this to come up with a scope doc.
> > >       2. Currently sentry stores only grant privileges. This is not
> > >    flexible. Let's say an administrator wants to grant role with select
> > on
> > > the
> > >    all tables in a database except for couple to them, he needs to
> > > individual
> > >    select privileges for each table.
> > >       1. Implementation should let you add a grant privilege on
> database
> > >       and revokes privileges on the tables with in that database,
> > >       2. This needs new look into privilege model that sentry currently
> > > has.
> > >
> > >
> > > -Kalyan
> > >
> > >
> > > -Kalyan
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 12:16 PM, Alexander Kolbasov <
> ak...@cloudera.com
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Good point. There is some support for user-level privileges in 2.0
> > > already
> > > > - do you think that it is not sufficient and is missing some parts?
> > > >
> > > > Is there anyone reading this who participated in the user-level
> > > privileges
> > > > in Sentry work done earlier? Is there any design doc for this?
> > > >
> > > > - Alex
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 10:11 AM, Na Li <lina...@cloudera.com>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Sasha,
> > > > >
> > > > > It would be nice to have more features for sentry.
> > > > >
> > > > > For example, make user-based privileges working. So user can assign
> > > user
> > > > > directly to a role instead of through group.
> > > > >
> > > > > Lina
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 11:58 AM, Alexander Kolbasov <
> > > ak...@cloudera.com
> > > > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Now that we have Sentry 2.0 release, I think it is a good time to
> > > step
> > > > > back
> > > > > > from fixing bugs and immediate problems and start discussions on
> > > > roadmap
> > > > > > for Sentry going forward. Do we want to just keep it as is and
> > > improve
> > > > > > things here and there or we want to add new features?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > What do people think?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > - Alex
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to