Sounds reasonable to me as long as they can get someone to do the commit in a reasonable timeframe. I wouldn’t want to have to wait days for it to get in after it has been properly reviewed.
> On Feb 22, 2018, at 12:22 PM, Alexander Kolbasov <ak...@cloudera.com> wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > I would like to propose an adjustment to the commit process in Sentry > project. The idea is to require that commit should not be done by the > person providing the change but by some other committer. This committer's > responsibility is to ensure that all code review concerns were addressed in > one way or another and to do a final sanity check. This committer can be > one of the reviewers or someone who didn't review the code. > > What do you think? > > - Alex
