-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/68727/#review208797
-----------------------------------------------------------




sentry-service/sentry-service-server/src/main/java/org/apache/sentry/provider/db/service/persistent/SentryStore.java
Lines 4911 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/68727/#comment292999>

    This method is already public, so you don't need the @VisibleForTesting 
annotation.



sentry-service/sentry-service-server/src/main/java/org/apache/sentry/provider/db/service/persistent/SentryStoreInterface.java
Lines 804-806 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/68727/#comment293000>

    Would be a good idea to specify which tables contain HMS Metadata as this 
interface is shared by other implementations and would need help to understand 
what to delete.



sentry-service/sentry-service-server/src/main/java/org/apache/sentry/service/thrift/FullUpdateInitializer.java
Lines 549-555 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/68727/#comment293001>

    You could save time and code by checking if the partition location is part 
of the table location inside the PartitionTask.doTask() method instead. 
    
    There is one part of the code there:
    
        String partPath = pathFromURI(part.getSd().getLocation());
        If (partPath != null) {
          partitionNames.add(partPath.intern());
        }
        
    If as part of the if() condition you also call 
!isPartitionLocatedWithinTableLocation(), then that should make the rest of the 
code work without too many changes.


- Sergio Pena


On Sept. 17, 2018, 3:07 p.m., kalyan kumar kalvagadda wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/68727/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Sept. 17, 2018, 3:07 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for sentry, Alexander Kolbasov, Arjun Mishra, Na Li, and 
> Sergio Pena.
> 
> 
> Bugs: SENTRY-2306
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SENTRY-2306
> 
> 
> Repository: sentry
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Ignore the partitions entries which are located in default location as they 
> share the same permissions as the table. This will reduce the snapshot size 
> decreasing the time to persist the snapshot and also time to send the full 
> update to Namenode. This is important as the partition information has lion’s 
> share in a HMS Full snapshot.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> sentry-service/sentry-service-server/src/main/java/org/apache/sentry/provider/db/service/persistent/SentryStore.java
>  1eda41b2b6bd940a404cc1ba09a861fe783ead04 
>   
> sentry-service/sentry-service-server/src/main/java/org/apache/sentry/provider/db/service/persistent/SentryStoreInterface.java
>  0b4f4aa24bd3002c50bf4d80a6fa361f66052973 
>   
> sentry-service/sentry-service-server/src/main/java/org/apache/sentry/service/thrift/FullUpdateInitializer.java
>  3e27d1bbee9bea9a60e7f7e012a367957610826c 
>   
> sentry-service/sentry-service-server/src/main/java/org/apache/sentry/service/thrift/SentryService.java
>  b3a4934dfc523d14eec216df00a6b7597c66c166 
>   
> sentry-service/sentry-service-server/src/test/java/org/apache/sentry/service/thrift/TestFullUpdateInitializer.java
>  589acbed12855ff09309a04c9214f8daf87ea1de 
>   
> sentry-tests/sentry-tests-hive/src/test/java/org/apache/sentry/tests/e2e/hdfs/TestHDFSIntegrationEnd2End.java
>  574bc4b0432824abc81fe3c0dd30d1fe01f012e5 
>   
> sentry-tests/sentry-tests-hive/src/test/java/org/apache/sentry/tests/e2e/minisentry/InternalSentryService.java
>  PRE-CREATION 
>   
> sentry-tests/sentry-tests-hive/src/test/java/org/apache/sentry/tests/e2e/minisentry/InternalSentrySrv.java
>  9fa42f2de41b6700a18a358f8d5e442104dd0585 
>   
> sentry-tests/sentry-tests-hive/src/test/java/org/apache/sentry/tests/e2e/minisentry/SentrySrv.java
>  0e82b86a727f578013a63c005aa05279790344f1 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/68727/diff/1/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Made sure all the existing tests passed and also added unit and e2e tests to 
> verify the new behavior.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> kalyan kumar kalvagadda
> 
>

Reply via email to