-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/68973/#review209865
-----------------------------------------------------------




sentry-core/sentry-core-common/src/main/java/org/apache/sentry/service/common/ServiceConstants.java
Lines 152 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/68973/#comment294471>

    how can we make this variable name to not be confused with threads fetching 
an hms snapshot?



sentry-core/sentry-core-common/src/main/java/org/apache/sentry/service/common/ServiceConstants.java
Lines 153 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/68973/#comment294481>

    is there an optimal value higher than 2 to make it faster?



sentry-service/sentry-service-server/src/main/java/org/apache/sentry/provider/db/service/persistent/SentryStore.java
Lines 3476-3479 (original), 3491-3494 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/68973/#comment294476>

    I wonder how much memory do we expect in the worst case scenarios to be 
hold in memory for all these objects in the pool?
    
    In the previous patchthe objects were persisted (1 at a time), and GC could 
collected them.



sentry-service/sentry-service-server/src/main/java/org/apache/sentry/provider/db/service/persistent/SentryStore.java
Line 3478 (original), 3493 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/68973/#comment294483>

    This is executed in a different transaction?



sentry-service/sentry-service-server/src/main/java/org/apache/sentry/provider/db/service/persistent/SentryStore.java
Line 3481 (original), 3496 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/68973/#comment294480>

    Shouldn't we destroy or stop the persisting process of the rest of the 
paths if the persistingSnapshotFailed is true?



sentry-service/sentry-service-server/src/main/java/org/apache/sentry/provider/db/service/persistent/SentryStore.java
Lines 3510 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/68973/#comment294478>

    Aren't these deleted during the rollback?



sentry-service/sentry-service-server/src/main/java/org/apache/sentry/provider/db/service/persistent/SentryStore.java
Lines 5106-5112 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/68973/#comment294482>

    How often does this code get ID conflicts while persisting in a threaded 
process? Isn't this going to make the persisting slow?


- Sergio Pena


On Oct. 22, 2018, 2:42 p.m., kalyan kumar kalvagadda wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/68973/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Oct. 22, 2018, 2:42 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for sentry, Arjun Mishra, Na Li, and Sergio Pena.
> 
> 
> Bugs: SENTRY-2305
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SENTRY-2305
> 
> 
> Repository: sentry
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> I have considered multiple options. Persisting in batches is not an option 
> with out changing the schema as the data nucleus does not persist row in 
> batches for tables which have foreign key on other tables.
> 
> I see that best option is to persist the paths in parallel. It gave good 
> results.
> 
> Solution Approach:
> 
> I have used a thread pool to persist the snapshot. Size of this thread pool 
> is configurable. Paths for each object database/table are submitted to this 
> thread pool. If for reason some of the paths are not pesisted, snapshot is 
> removed and exception is throw back.
> 
>   This patch along with SENTRY-2423 was 5 times faster when tested with below.
> 
>  
> 
> Object Type   Count
> Databases     209
> Tables        2100
> Partitions    200004
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> sentry-core/sentry-core-common/src/main/java/org/apache/sentry/service/common/ServiceConstants.java
>  092060c450c6a906850630cb10454737157af5fe 
>   
> sentry-service/sentry-service-server/src/main/java/org/apache/sentry/provider/db/service/persistent/SentryStore.java
>  b387a22e40b8958395e1c12af12272b89a778726 
>   
> sentry-service/sentry-service-server/src/test/java/org/apache/sentry/provider/db/service/persistent/TestHMSFollower.java
>  0d62941a7bd45e0d8a67b5d95fdb39a8801f5a26 
>   
> sentry-service/sentry-service-server/src/test/java/org/apache/sentry/provider/db/service/persistent/TestSentryStore.java
>  4a9afe303672baff39be01d4f190034b2bfb75fe 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/68973/diff/5/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Added new test and also made sure that existing tests passed.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> kalyan kumar kalvagadda
> 
>

Reply via email to