Filed SENTRY-1083 for sentry cache system.

On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 7:21 PM, Hao Hao <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> We just finished this monthly hangout. The summary of our discussion today:
>
>    - Disccussed about the status of sentry generic model regards of
>    - when to merge hive model and generic model so do not need to maintain
>       two models for new feature developement.
>       - features should be improved for generic mode. Captured in
>       Sentry-1080 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SENTRY-1080>.
>    - Discussed some road map items:
>       - User level privileges: Sentry-711
>       <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SENTRY-711>.
>       - HBase Integration limitation and the needs of client side cache.
>
> Best,
> Hao
>
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 9:24 PM, Hao Hao <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > So the proposed agenda for this monthly hangout would be:
> >
> >    - generic modeling status
> >    - the road map and future milestones
> >    - sentry integration with other components
> >
> > Please let me know if you have any questions.
> >
> > Best,
> > Hao
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 3:30 PM, Hao Hao <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> +1 Thanks Anne!
> >>
> >> Best,
> >> Hao
> >>
> >> On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 3:29 PM, Anne Yu <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >>> The most updated status for sentry generic modeling, integration with
> >>> other
> >>> components, the road map and milestones for future.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Anne
> >>> On Feb 16, 2016 3:23 PM, "Hao Hao" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> > Hi folks,
> >>> >
> >>> > Any suggestions for the monthly hangout this week? Thanks!
> >>> >
> >>> > Best,
> >>> > Hao
> >>> >
> >>> > On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 11:05 AM, Hao Hao <[email protected]>
> >>> wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> > > Hi folks,
> >>> > >
> >>> > > The February monthly hangout will be on Feb. 18th, since Colin and
> >>> Dapeng
> >>> > > cannot make this Thursday. Thanks!
> >>> > >
> >>> > > Best,
> >>> > > Hao
> >>> > >
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
>



-- 
Thanks,
Anne

Reply via email to