I agree the cut off time of docs related items should be the release date. Should we start a new thread to discuss this? Thanks!
Best, Hao On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 7:51 PM, Hao Hao <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi All, > > We just finish March monthly hangout. The main topic of our discussion > today is preparing for 1.7.0 Release: > > - Reviewed the main New Features candidates for 1.7.0. They are Kafka > Integration, Solr Integration, Solr Shell, Audit Log for Generic Model, > Sentry Shell, Hive V2 (if e2e tests are complete), HDFS sync changes ( > SENTRY-953 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SENTRY-953>, > SENTRY-957 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SENTRY-957>). > - Discussed new features required documentations. Sentry Shell > documentations are completed (SENTRY-1006 > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SENTRY-1006>). Other new > features still need documentations. > > > Thanks! > > > Best, > Hao > > On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 5:34 PM, Ma, Junjie <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> After every new release, I think there should be a discussion for the >> features which will be included in next release. Based on this list, we can >> have a roughly release date. >> >> Best regards, >> >> Colin Ma(Ma Jun Jie) >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Sravya Tirukkovalur [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2016 5:51 AM >> To: dev >> Subject: Re: March monthly hangout >> >> In my opinion having roughly regular release dates is good, but it would >> also be good to make sure features which go into these releases are >> reasonably complete and have sufficient test coverage and documentation so >> that the release itself is high quality and consumable. We are usually ok >> with completeness and testing, but we tend to fall behind in terms of >> documentation. By doing so, I am ok if we push the release a few weeks if >> need be. What do you think? >> >> >> On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 1:38 PM, Lenni Kuff <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > Do we want to drive releases by feature sets or should we set regular >> > release dates and include whatever makes those date? >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Lenni >> > >> > On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 1:32 PM, Sravya Tirukkovalur >> > <[email protected]> >> > wrote: >> > >> > > +1 for discussing release updates. >> > > >> > > I think it may help to have a list of features/improvements which >> > > are >> > going >> > > in 1.7.0 before hand, so that we can discuss which of these are >> > > complete (in terms of functionality/ testing/ documentation). We >> > > should either >> > track >> > > the remaining jiras for 1.7.0 and get them in, or move the feature >> > > itself to next release? I just moved the pending jiras to 1.8.0 and >> > > here is how the current release notes look like for 1.7.0: >> > > >> > > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=1233334 >> > 8&styleName=Html&projectId=12314720&Create=Create&atl_token=A5KQ-2QAV- >> > T4JA-FDED%7C3b77d94d8cd2c79d6254dea938861fe25ad62f39%7Clin >> > > >> > > Seems like we will need to fix the issue types for some of the >> > > jiras, >> > right >> > > now I only see Sentry-906 as the only new feature :-) >> > > >> > > >> > > On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 12:45 PM, Hao Hao <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > > >> > > > Hi All, >> > > > >> > > > Tomorrow is the March monthly hangout. Since we are planning to do >> > Sentry >> > > > 1.7.0 release, I propose to discuss it as a part of tomorrow’s >> agenda. >> > > Any >> > > > other suggestions for the topics you want to discuss? Thanks! >> > > > >> > > > Best, >> > > > Hao >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > -- >> > > Sravya Tirukkovalur >> > > >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Sravya Tirukkovalur >> > >
