On 1 September 2015 at 13:09, Bert Huijben <[email protected]> wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Ivan Zhakov [mailto:[email protected]]
>> Sent: dinsdag 1 september 2015 11:44
>> To: Bert Huijben <[email protected]>
>> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: svn commit: r1700439 - in /serf/tools/buildbot/windows: serf-
>> config.cmd.template serftest-build.cmd serftest-cleanup.cmd serftest-
>> template.cmd serftest-test.cmd
>>
>> On 1 September 2015 at 12:39, Bert Huijben <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> -----Original Message-----
>> >> From: Ivan Zhakov [mailto:[email protected]]
>> >> Sent: dinsdag 1 september 2015 11:37
>> >> To: [email protected]
>> >> Cc: [email protected]
>> >> Subject: Re: svn commit: r1700439 - in /serf/tools/buildbot/windows: serf-
>> >> config.cmd.template serftest-build.cmd serftest-cleanup.cmd serftest-
>> >> template.cmd serftest-test.cmd
>> >
>> >
>> >> > +taskkill /im msbuild.exe /f 2> nul:
>> >> > +taskkill /im svn.exe /f 2> nul:
>> >> Is it really needed for serf tests to run?
>> >
>> > This buildbot runs on the same hardware and as the same user as the
>> > svn-windows-ra buildbot, so to guarantee stable runs I think we should
>> > just apply the same kills from both runs.
>> >
>> But test will fail anyway if serf test kill svn.exe while svn tests
>> are running. Did I miss something?
>
> As answered on IRC:
> Yes
>
> * All builds on this slave run sequential, so no other buildbot task will run 
> at the same time
> * The other buildbot (svn-windows-local) runs as a different -not 
> administrator- user, so
> the taskkill commands won't apply to that bot.
>
> The problem on the Windows bot was that sometimes the python scripts timeout 
> while
> some subversion command still hangs (and sometimes takes 100% of a CPU core),
> these commands which are just copied from there just improve the chance on a 
> OK
> build after some severely broken previous build.
>
>
> But please don't apply these scripts as generic good scripts on a separate 
> bot.... :-)
>
Thanks for clarification! I asked to check that these changes was
intentional and was not result of copy-paste from svn scripts.


-- 
Ivan Zhakov

Reply via email to