On 1 November 2015 at 17:56,  <rhuij...@apache.org> wrote:
> Author: rhuijben
> Date: Sun Nov  1 14:56:57 2015
> New Revision: 1711794
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1711794&view=rev
> Log:
> Implement get_remaining support on the standard iovec bucket.
>
> * buckets/iovec_buckets.c
>   (serf_iovec_get_remaining): New function.
>   (serf_bucket_type_iovec): Implement as v2 bucket and handle get_remaining.
>
> Modified:
>     serf/trunk/buckets/iovec_buckets.c
>
> Modified: serf/trunk/buckets/iovec_buckets.c
> URL: 
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/serf/trunk/buckets/iovec_buckets.c?rev=1711794&r1=1711793&r2=1711794&view=diff
> ==============================================================================
> --- serf/trunk/buckets/iovec_buckets.c (original)
> +++ serf/trunk/buckets/iovec_buckets.c Sun Nov  1 14:56:57 2015
> @@ -155,6 +155,19 @@ static apr_status_t serf_iovec_peek(serf
>      return APR_SUCCESS;
>  }
>
> +static apr_uint64_t serf_iovec_get_remaining(serf_bucket_t *bucket)
> +{
> +    iovec_context_t *ctx = bucket->data;
> +    apr_uint64_t total = 0;
> +    int i;
> +
> +    for (i = ctx->current_vec; i < ctx->vecs_len; i++)
> +      {
> +        total += ctx->vecs[i].iov_len;
> +      }
> +
> +    return total;
> +}
>
You should take 'ctx->offset' in account for get_remaining() calculation.

PS: Test will be great also.


-- 
Ivan Zhakov

Reply via email to