Author: brane
Date: Sat May 31 03:14:39 2025
New Revision: 1926000
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1926000&view=rev
Log:
* test/test_ssl.c (test_ssl_ocsp_verify_response_no_signer):
Change the expected error code to make the test pass. This is actually
not a cheap hack; the reason is documented in the source.
Modified:
serf/trunk/test/test_ssl.c
Modified: serf/trunk/test/test_ssl.c
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/serf/trunk/test/test_ssl.c?rev=1926000&r1=1925999&r2=1926000&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- serf/trunk/test/test_ssl.c (original)
+++ serf/trunk/test/test_ssl.c Sat May 31 03:14:39 2025
@@ -2708,7 +2708,10 @@ static void test_ssl_ocsp_verify_respons
{
#ifndef OPENSSL_NO_OCSP
apr_status_t status = verify_ocsp_response(tc, 1, 0, 0, 0);
- CuAssertIntEquals(tc, SERF_ERROR_SSL_OCSP_RESPONSE_INVALID, status);
+ /* OCSP responses MUST be signed, we can't even cteate one
+ without a signature. This error doesn't come from response
+ validation but because OCSP_response_create() fails. */
+ CuAssertIntEquals(tc, APR_EGENERAL, status);
#endif /* OPENSSL_NO_OCSP */
}
