Den tis 15 juli 2025 kl 23:07 skrev Branko Čibej <br...@apache.org>:
> r1927249. Please review; I haven't tested with Subversion yet. > > I'm thinking that this implementation can stay as a fallback if there is > no unbound/c-ares/whatever available. It works, though it's not the most > blazingly efficient way to do this. It would be a pity to disable the > API just because of some missing optional dependencies. > I've looked but I think it is a bit over my level of experience to really review, sorry. Have you checked if the proposed API would make sense for unbound/c-ares? Probably a good idea to keep the APR-thread based implementation - maybe that would even be enough (at least for a start)? Or is it missing something? Cheers, Daniel
