I think it depends on the user requirement. we can keep the old code there, if the user want to use it , we can put it back.
On 2/26/18, Zheng Feng <zh.f...@gmail.com> wrote: > It looks good. Do we want to support the old saga module in the future ? > > 2018-02-24 16:47 GMT+08:00 Willem Jiang <willem.ji...@gmail.com>: > >> Hi team, >> >> As we are planning the servicecomb-saga binary release[1], I found out >> there are some old saga modules in the current master branch need to be >> archived. >> >> My proposal is we create a branch which holds current master branch codes >> and remove the old saga module from the master branch. After that, we >> just >> put the pack modules into the binary release of servicecomb-saga. >> >> Any thoughts？ >> >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCB-346 >> >> Willem Jiang >> >> Blog: http://willemjiang.blogspot.com (English) >> http://jnn.iteye.com (Chinese) >> Twitter: willemjiang >> Weibo: 姜宁willem >> > -- Willem Jiang Blog: http://willemjiang.blogspot.com (English) http://jnn.iteye.com (Chinese) Twitter: willemjiang Weibo: 姜宁willem
