If you follow the twitter of ServiceComb, you may already know about there
are two languages (go and C#) of Saga Omega implementations[1].
It's great to see more and more users interested about ServiceComb and we
are building good eco system for the user to solve the problem in the micro
services world.

[1]https://twitter.com/ServiceComb/status/1030996830463520768


Willem Jiang

Twitter: willemjiang
Weibo: 姜宁willem

On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 9:51 AM, bismy <bi...@qq.com> wrote:

> Great. ServiceComb is running very stable in production for several our
> customers. And The community is very open to help others to join and
> discuss microservices topics.
>
>
>
>
> ------------------ 原始邮件 ------------------
> 发件人: "Kirin Wang"<wangqilint...@gmail.com>;
> 发送时间: 2018年8月15日(星期三) 下午5:35
> 收件人: "dev"<dev@servicecomb.apache.org>;
>
> 主题: Re: [DISCUSS] Heading to graduation
>
>
>
> Good thread,     ServiceComb is getting more and more mature now
>
> Willem Jiang <willem.ji...@gmail.com> 于2018年8月15日周三 下午5:09写道:
>
> > With the ServiceComb java-chassis 1.0.0-incubating and service-center
> > 1.0.0-incubating release officially out.
> > We believe it is time to discuss what requirements remains to consider
> > graduation to the TLP.
> >
> > I just updated the ServiceComb Project Status for it:
> >
> > http://servicecomb.incubator.apache.org/
> >
> > Apache ServiceComb entered incubation in November of 2017, ServiceComb
> > community learned a lot about how to do things in Apache ways.
> > Now we are a very helpful and engaged community, ready to help on all
> > questions from the ServiceComb Community.
> > We are making consensus decisions through the discussion in the mailing
> > list and voted 3 new committers.
> > We managed delivered three round released include 5 different binary
> > release, now we can do self-driving releases in good cadence.
> >
> > Please check out the maturity assessment doc[1] for more information.
> >
> > [1]
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SERVICECOMB/Apache+Maturity+
> > Model+Assessment+for+ServiceComb
> >
> > Any thoughts? And welcome advice from ServiceComb Mentors?
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> >
> >
> > Willem Jiang
> >
> > Twitter: willemjiang
> > Weibo: 姜宁willem
> >
> > On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 4:16 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > It sounds good !
> > >
> > > In the mean time, I'm moving forward on the assessment document and
> > > preparing the resolution.
> > >
> > > I will send an update during the weekend.
> > >
> > > Regards
> > > JB
> > >
> > > On 13/07/2018 09:44, Willem Jiang wrote:
> > > > Yeah, we are heading to TLP.
> > > >
> > > > Current we are planing release ServiceComb Service-Center 1.0.0,
> > > > SerivceComb Java-Chassis 1.0.0 this month.
> > > > The ServiceComb trademark transfer process looks good.
> > > > And we make consensus decisions through the discussion - vote
> process.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Willem Jiang
> > > >
> > > > Twitter: willemjiang
> > > > Weibo: 姜宁willem
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, Jul 8, 2018 at 1:59 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <
> j...@nanthrax.net>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Hi all,
> > > >>
> > > >> Last week, Willem and I had a long discussion about the status of
> the
> > > >> ServiceComb podling.
> > > >>
> > > >> IMHO, we are almost ready for graduation.
> > > >>
> > > >> We worked on the maturity assessment doc:
> > > >>
> > > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/
> > > SERVICECOMB/Apache+Maturity+
> > > >> Model+Assessment+for+ServiceComb
> > > >>
> > > >> So, it looks good to me, I'm doing a new pass on the assessment
> model
> > > >> providing some details on some topics, but overall good.
> > > >>
> > > >> I wanted to have your inputs about that (heading to TLP).
> > > >>
> > > >> Thoughts ?
> > > >>
> > > >> Regards
> > > >> JB
> > > >> --
> > > >> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> > > >> jbono...@apache.org
> > > >> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> > > >> Talend - http://www.talend.com
> > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> > > jbono...@apache.org
> > > http://blog.nanthrax.net
> > > Talend - http://www.talend.com
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to