[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1169?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_40928
]
Bruce Snyder commented on SM-1169:
----------------------------------
{quote}
Support for virtual host by name- Should these be separate services?
http://companyA.com:8080/serviceA/
http://companyB.com:8080/serviceA/
{quote}
Are you referring to a single host providing both TLDs? And because both
domains are provided by the same host, then you're asking if serviceA should be
the same instance or a different instance for each domain? If that's what
you're asking, I'd argue that each domain should have it's own instance of
serviceA.
> Provide support for using a JHC client in the http provider endpoint
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SM-1169
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1169
> Project: ServiceMix
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: servicemix-http
> Affects Versions: 3.3
> Reporter: Adrian Co
> Assignee: Bruce Snyder
> Fix For: 3.3
>
> Attachments: http-provider.patch
>
>
> Current http client in the new http provider endpoint uses the jetty client,
> which does not support ssl or proxy. Using the new JHC client supports both
> ssl and proxy. Also, creating a client api to plug the nio implementation of
> the jhc might be useful.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
