[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1383?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=43336#action_43336
]
lhe edited comment on SM-1383 at 6/9/08 7:22 AM:
------------------------------------------------------------
Actually I replaced the older drools version in trunk with the 4.0.7 version of
drools.
I think it's better not having 2 version of drools jbi engine in smx.
Should the 3.2 also use the new 4.0.7 version of drools?
What do you think?
was (Author: lhe):
Should this be applied to 3.2? In my opinion it's maybe good to implement
only in 3.3.
What do you think?
> Changes in servicemix-drools for Drools 4.0.7
> ---------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SM-1383
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1383
> Project: ServiceMix
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: servicemix-components
> Affects Versions: 3.2.2
> Reporter: Roman Stumm
> Assignee: Lars Heinemann
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 3.2.2
>
> Attachments: servicemix-drools4.patch, servicemix-drools4.zip
>
>
> I found that ServiceMix-3.2.1 still is supporting drools-3.0.3.
> We are using Drools-4.0.7, so I had to make some changes in
> \servicemix-3.2.1\deployables\serviceengines\servicemix-drools in some
> classes and the test .drl files.
> I append the complete project-source and a svn-patch. Maybe you want to
> support drools-4 in one of the future servicemix-releases (if this is not
> already done by someone).
> Best regards
> Roman
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
