[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1621?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=47165#action_47165
]
Ron Gavlin commented on SM-1621:
--------------------------------
Hi Freeman,
I am not sure I understand your workaround. In my failing example above, I did
not specify the replyDestination. Your workaround seems to suggest "the
customer needn't specify the replyDestination". Did you mean to say "the
customer must specify a replyDestination"? If so, then yes, I agree this could
be an interim workaround.
Have you had a chance to review the new JMS transport code in CXF based on
Spring JMS? I believe it supports temporary replyDestinations.
> New JMS in/out provider should support temporary queues/topics (as reply
> destinations)
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SM-1621
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1621
> Project: ServiceMix
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: 3.2.2
> Reporter: Freeman Fang
> Assignee: Freeman Fang
> Fix For: 3.2.3, servicemix-jms-2008.02
>
>
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
