[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SMX4KNL-169?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=48859#action_48859
]
Guillaume Nodet commented on SMX4KNL-169:
-----------------------------------------
Thanks for the heads up. Having to configure a different port when running
multiple kernels on the same host sounds good to me.
As for run level combinations, I did not really envision that, and I would
think a good practice would be to set the run level to the same value on both
the master and the slave. I don't really see a good use case for having two
different lock levels ...
> Use the start level to implement the container level locking
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SMX4KNL-169
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SMX4KNL-169
> Project: ServiceMix Kernel
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Guillaume Nodet
> Fix For: 1.1.0
>
> Attachments: SMX4KNL-169.patch
>
>
> This should allow hot fail-over with all bundles being already installed and
> ready to be started.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
