Just an addition to my initial posting: Option #2 has the positive side effect of reminding us to release a contained snapshot bundle before releasing next SMX version.
Regards Lars lhein wrote: > > Hi fellow devs, > > I am just wondering what is a better approach for handling the build > of SMX4 assembly in the means of contained bundle versions. > For now the assembly (even 4.1.0-SNAPSHOT) does only come with the > recent stable releases of our components and other > deps - for instance 2009.01 for components even while the snapshots of > those components are improved. > So if someone is downloading a dev snapshot of smx4 he will get stable > versions of the components but he may be interested in the latest > versions maybe. > Now he has to uninstall and install a newer version of several bundles > inside manually. > > What do you think is the preferred way to build an assembly. I mean > there are 2 possibilities for that: > > #1: Assemblies always only contain release versions of components and > alike > #2: Assemblies may contain snapshot versions of components and alike > > What do you think is best? > > Regards > Lars > > > > -- > http://lhein.blogspot.com > > > ----- > Regards > Lars > > > http://lhein.blogspot.com > > ----- Regards Lars http://lhein.blogspot.com http://lhein.blogspot.com -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-DISCUSS--What-versions-to-put-into-assembly-of-SMX4%28-SNAPSHOT%29-tp24954683p25166849.html Sent from the ServiceMix - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
