CXF-BC Component isn't JBI conform
----------------------------------

                 Key: SMXCOMP-660
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SMXCOMP-660
             Project: ServiceMix Components
          Issue Type: Bug
          Components: servicemix-cxf-bc
    Affects Versions: servicemix-cxf-bc-2009.01
            Reporter: Christian Connert
            Priority: Critical


Hi,

I just noticed that the CXF-BC Component ain't standard conform. There are 
several problems:

1.) The JbiInInterceptor is supposed to write the (soap) headers to the 
NormalizedMessage (javax.jbi.messaging.protocol.headers). Accordingly to the 
JBI Spec. the headers should be stored within a 
Map<String,org.w3c.dom.DocumentFragment>. But in fact the JbiInInterceptor just 
puts the header.getObject() in the map. Which results in a ClassCastException 
in other components (like JMS). The objects are some DOM ElementImpl.

2.) I'm very unhappy with the fix 
(https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SMXCOMP-203 states) which removes 
the WS-Security header from the propagated headers. It's not necessary that the 
security is implemented with cxf. Thus I think that this fix is not correct. It 
would be better to e.g. use some other saaj implementation (for instance 
axis2). Further it might help to at some xerces jar into the class path, but I 
haven't tested it yet.

3.) If useJBIWrapper==true the JbiInWsdl1Interceptor warps the message within 
JBI parts. That is correct. If headers are specified in the WSDL then these 
headers are added as separate parts. But it never removes the headers, which 
where added as part, from the SoapMessage, thus the JbiInInterceptor will put 
them into the javax.jbi.messaging.protocol.headers map. I think this is not 
like it should be. Servicemix soap does remove the headers form the underlying 
message and only puts unspecified (not part of the WSDL) headers into the 
javax.jbi.messaging.protocol.headers map.

kind regards

Christian

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to