+1 to send to commits@

J

On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 6:49 AM, Freeman Fang <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On 2009-11-26, at 下午6:07, Gert Vanthienen wrote:
>
>> L.S.,
>>
>> Looking at http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/view/ServiceMix/,
>> there appear to be a few builds failing or unstable at the moment.
>> From the current failures, only the ServiceMix3 one looks like it's
>> pure Hudson-related (looking into that one myself now).  I would like
>> to propose to send mail notifications for unstable/failed builds to
>> the mailing list so we don't have to remind ourselves to go and check
>> the builds to see if they're all sunny.
>>
>> Personally, I would propose to configure the notifications to be sent
>> when a build fails or becomes unstable and when it goes stable again,
>> but avoid sending mails on repetitive unstable builds to avoid
>> spamming the mailing list too much.  If there's too much
>> Hudson-traffic on the mailing list, we can always create a dedicated
>> mailing list afterwards (I think that's what CXF does now).  What
>> mailing list would be best suited to send the notifications to (dev@
>> or commits@ are the two obvious candidates I guess)?
>
> +1 to send to commits@
>>
>> Another proposal would be to configure Hudson to rebuild servicemix
>> projects whenever snapshot dependencies get updated (to find out when
>> changes in cxf/camel/... have an impact on our own code or tests).
>>
> +1
>
> Thanks
> Freeman
>>
>> Wdyt?
>>
>> Gert Vanthienen
>> ------------------------
>> Open Source SOA: http://fusesource.com
>> Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/
>
>
> --
> Freeman Fang
> ------------------------
> Open Source SOA: http://fusesource.com
>
>

Reply via email to