Charles,

The code for that plugin can be found in
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/servicemix/maven-plugins/docs-maven-plugin/trunk/

Regards,

Gert Vanthienen
------------------------
Open Source SOA: http://fusesource.com
Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/



On 25 June 2010 16:02, Charles Moulliard <[email protected]> wrote:
> Where have you committed the code about confluence -> docbook
> converter (maven plugin to reuse Mylyn Wikitext) ?
>
> KR,
>
> Charles Moulliard
>
> Senior Enterprise Architect (J2EE, .NET, SOA)
> Apache Camel - ServiceMix Committer
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com |  Twitter : 
> http://twitter.com/cmoulliard
> Linkedin : http://www.linkedin.com/in/charlesmoulliard | Skype: cmoulliard
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 6:43 AM, Guillaume Nodet <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 13:53, Guillaume Nodet <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> FWIW, I'm working on enhancing the confluence -> docbook converter
>>> maven plugin to reuse Mylyn Wikitext project.  This will offer much
>>> more features that what it provides now, such as links whithin the
>>> document and much more.
>>
>> I've committed the changes i was working on.
>>
>>> I've also written a small maven plugin which generate some docbook xml
>>> based on the console commands, so we can include all the command
>>> reference as an appendix or something like that.  I'll check it in
>>> asap.
>>
>> This one has also been committed at Karaf.
>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 11:48, Gert Vanthienen
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> L.S.,
>>>>
>>>> The documentation project is currently set up to use the DocBook
>>>> toolchain to generate the the HTML pages and PDF documents.  For
>>>> writing the actual content, there are two options:
>>>> - use the pure DocBook XML syntax
>>>> - use Confluence wiki markup, which will be transformed to DocBook XML
>>>> in the target/docbkx/sources folder to be picked up by the DocBook
>>>> tooling again
>>>>
>>>> We talked about which syntax to use in
>>>> http://servicemix.396122.n5.nabble.com/PROPOSAL-Starting-the-documentation-project-td447701.html#a447701
>>>> -- personally, I would use the Confluence wiki markup wherever we can
>>>> for most of the text (because it's less verbose, easier to
>>>> write/maintain, ...) but we'll keep the big outline and things like
>>>> tocs, indices, ... in DocBook XML to ensure we can get the most out of
>>>> that toolchain as well.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Gert Vanthienen
>>>> ------------------------
>>>> Open Source SOA: http://fusesource.com
>>>> Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 18 June 2010 11:10, Charles Moulliard <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> Gert,
>>>>>
>>>>> Do you plan to word and build the documentation using docbook ?
>>>>>
>>>>> KR,
>>>>>
>>>>> Charles Moulliard
>>>>>
>>>>> Senior Enterprise Architect (J2EE, .NET, SOA)
>>>>> Apache Camel - ServiceMix Committer
>>>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>>> Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com |  Twitter : 
>>>>> http://twitter.com/cmoulliard
>>>>> Linkedin : http://www.linkedin.com/in/charlesmoulliard | Skype: cmoulliard
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 10:29 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré 
>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>> Hi Gert,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It's a good idea.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think that we need to see three big topics in our documentation :
>>>>>> - user guide: people who mainly create the artifacts (SU/SA/OSGi bundles)
>>>>>> - administrator guide: people who are responsible of SMX in production 
>>>>>> (installation, monitoring, deployment of artifacts, etc)
>>>>>> - developer guide: people who work around ServiceMix, on bottom of the 
>>>>>> artifacts
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>> JB
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  On Fri 18/06/10 10:12, "Gert Vanthienen" [email protected] 
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> L.S.,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In the documentation projects' docs/manual directory, we are building
>>>>>>> a ServiceMix users/programmers guide.  I would like to add parts for
>>>>>>> all the different technologies we have in ServiceMix in a more or less
>>>>>>> 'natural' order of use (similar to what we have in
>>>>>>> http://servicemix.apache.org/SMX4/technology-selection-guidelin
>>>>>>> es.html
>>>>>> at the moment):
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> * part 1 : overview and getting started -- there's already have a good
>>>>>>> deal of content for this part that was created by Jean-Baptiste and
>>>>>>> Charles, the technology selection guidelines probably fit into this
>>>>>>> section well as well
>>>>>>> * part 2 : Camel -- about creating, deploying, monitoring, ... Camel
>>>>>>> routes
>>>>>> * part 3 : ActiveMQ
>>>>>>> * part 4 : CXF
>>>>>>> * part 5 : NMR
>>>>>>> * part 6 : JBI -- the goal here is to focus on deployment options,
>>>>>>> packaging, ...  - the full reference of endpoints/components will be
>>>>>>> available in a seperate JBI reference manual (in the docs/jbi
>>>>>>> directory)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If this looks OK to people, I'll start moving things a bit, create
>>>>>>> stub pages for the different parts and get started on the Camel
>>>>>>> section myself.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Wdyt?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Gert Vanthienen
>>>>>>> ------------------------
>>>>>>> Open Source SOA: http://fusesource.com
>>>>>> Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Cheers,
>>> Guillaume Nodet
>>> ------------------------
>>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>>> ------------------------
>>> Open Source SOA
>>> http://fusesource.com
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Cheers,
>> Guillaume Nodet
>> ------------------------
>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>> ------------------------
>> Open Source SOA
>> http://fusesource.com
>>
>

Reply via email to