Actually, there are lucene, elasticsearch and snmp4j.
I prefer to recut cleanly the release.
Regards
JB
On 06/28/2013 01:54 PM, Gert Vanthienen wrote:
JB,
We can still do a single vote with the original repo (without the
lucene and snmp4j bundles) and a second repository with the new
artifacts in there, if you prefer. My real concern was that it
wouldn't make any sense for you to have to recut all the other
releases if we can just reuse the tags and the existing artifacts.
For the people who have already voted, it might be nice to be able to
just do a quick sanity check on the first set of artifacts instead of
having to rebuild from source/install into Karaf/check signatures/...
and everything people do when voting on a bundles release.
Regards,
Gert
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 12:55 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]>
wrote:
Gert,
I prefer to have an consistent 2013.06 release.
No problem, I'm dealing with that.
Regards
JB
On 06/28/2013 12:53 PM, Gert Vanthienen wrote:
JB,
How about we remove those Lucene bundles and perhaps the SNMP4J one
from the staging repository and then restart the vote for the
remaining bundles?
Regards,
Gert
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]>
wrote:
Thanks Lukasz,
Even if this issue affect previously released Lucene bundles, I will
cancel
this vote and resubmit a new one with the fixes.
Regards
JB
On 06/28/2013 11:13 AM, Łukasz Dywicki wrote:
-1 since lucene bundles can't work together [1]. Lucene analyzers bundle
re-export two packages from lucene-core.
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SMX4-1490
Cheers,
Łukasz Dywicki
--
[email protected]
Twitter: ldywicki
Blog: http://dywicki.pl
Code-House - http://code-house.org
Wiadomość napisana przez Gert Vanthienen <[email protected]> w
dniu 27 cze 2013, o godz. 16:56:
+1 - looks good to me
I did bump into https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SMX4-1488 while
rebuilding those bundles from source - perhaps we should remove the
SNMP4J bundle from the staging repository and recut the release for
that one? Not sure though, since the issue seems to be dependent on
the version of Maven used for doing the build.
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 11:58 AM, Jon Anstey <[email protected]> wrote:
+1
On 2013-06-26 6:46 AM, "Jean-Baptiste Onofré" <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi all,
I submit ServiceMix Bundles 2013.06 release to your vote.
You can find the details of the release here:
https://issues.apache.org/**jira/issues/?filter=-4&jql=**
project%20%3D%20SMX4%20AND%**20fixVersion%20%3D%20%**
22bundles-2013.06%22%20ORDER%**20BY%20createdDate%20DESC<https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=-4&jql=project%20%3D%20SMX4%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%22bundles-2013.06%22%20ORDER%20BY%20createdDate%20DESC>
Staging repository:
https://repository.apache.org/**content/repositories/**
orgapacheservicemix-072/<https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheservicemix-072/>
Please vote to approve this release:
[ ] +1 Approve the release
[ ] -1 Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
This vote will be open for 72 hours.
Thanks,
Regards
JB
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
[email protected]
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
[email protected]
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
[email protected]
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
[email protected]
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
