Ok, I think, it should be no problem with 5.6.x. I wanted to know whether someone expects this to be released.
Regards Krzysztof On 17.11.2015 07:47, Cristiano Costantini wrote: > Hi, > Having a 5.6.x based on Camel 2.16.x would be appreciated, > anyway we plan to migrate to ServiceMix 6.x so even if a 5.6.x is released, > we will adopt it only for a short period of time. > > But this is just one voice :-) > > Bye > Cristiano > > > > > > > > Il giorno lun 16 nov 2015 alle ore 21:29 Krzysztof Sobkowiak < > [email protected]> ha scritto: > >> Hi >> >> We have currently 2 active branches for ServiceMix 5 (K24x) >> >> * 5.4.x - based on Camel 2.14.x >> * 5.5.x - based on Camel 2.15.x >> >> Do you think we should provide the next line 5.6.x based on Camel 2.16.x >> (like ServiceMix 6.1.x) or should we stop further development of ServiceMix >> 5 with line based on Camel 2.15.x? Wdyt? >> >> Regards >> Krzysztof >> >> >> -- >> Krzysztof Sobkowiak >> >> JEE & OSS Architect, Integration Architect >> Apache Software Foundation Member (http://apache.org/) >> Apache ServiceMix Committer & PMC Member (http://servicemix.apache.org/) >> Senior Solution Architect @ Capgemini SSC ( >> http://www.capgeminisoftware.pl/) >> >> >> 33rd Degree 4charity (http://2015.33degree.org/) >> -- Krzysztof Sobkowiak JEE & OSS Architect, Integration Architect Apache Software Foundation Member (http://apache.org/) Apache ServiceMix Committer & PMC Member (http://servicemix.apache.org/) Senior Solution Architect @ Capgemini SSC (http://www.capgeminisoftware.pl/) 33rd Degree 4charity (http://2015.33degree.org/)
