Thanks JB for the proposal. It looks promising and provides very interesting 
feature. I think, the new features repository will be a good place for this, as 
this feature will have lifecycle independent from the assembly lifecycle.

Kindly regards
Krzysztof

On 21.01.2017 08:41, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
>
> The schedule and contain sound good to me.
>
> Regarding the future of SMX, I think API Gateway/Management/Governance could 
> be a very interesting and unique feature provided by ServiceMix.
>
> I drafted the ideas in the following document:
>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lNpIRmJTFydnNpSH66URUU8EclVOiWQbh_OFM_v858s/edit?usp=sharing
>
> I also started a little PoC.
>
> I'm looking forward your comments ! ;)
>
> Thanks !
> Regards
> JB
>
> On 01/21/2017 01:46 AM, Krzysztof Sobkowiak wrote:
>> Hi all
>>
>> ServiceMix 7.0.0 is almost ready. Here my proposal for the next releases:
>>
>>   * 5.6.3 - upgrade to Camel 2.16.5 and CXF 3.1.9 and release the last 
>> version of the ServiceMix 5, next EOL
>>   * 6.0.x - EOL
>>   * 6.1.4 - upgrade to Camel 2.16.5 and CXF 3.1.9, some JIRA issues and the 
>> next release. It would be nice to have Karaf  3.0.9 too, but when no plans 
>> for 3.0.9 in the near future this upgrade can wait for 6.1.5. This branch 
>> would be alive as long we have new releases of Karaf, Camel, ActiveMQ and 
>> CXF - next EOL of ServiceMix 6
>>   * 7.0.1 - upgrade to Camel 2.16.5 and CXF 3.1.9 (I have forgotten these 
>> releases while preparing 7.0.0) and eventual bugs from 7.0.0 and the next 
>> release.
>>   * 7.1.0 - upgrade to Camel 2.17.5 or 2.18.x (but the problem with 
>> installation together with ActiveMQ must be solved first), Activiti 2.0.x 
>> and the JIRA tasks (profiles, ...). I'd like to resurrect our  ServiceMix 
>> Extra repository and move there the integration with Drools/JBPM 6, because 
>> some dependencies for Drools above 6.0.2 are no more available in Central 
>> and it's not clear whether we can simply use them.
>>   * ... Karaf 4.1.x, Cellar,  Documentation in AsciiDoc, Docker images, your 
>> ideas.... as discussed with JB and Claus during ApacheCon, ServiceMix could 
>> become an Apache project which could provide more interesting integration 
>> solutions so your ideas are warm welcome
>>
>> Kindly regards
>> Krzysztof
>>
>>
>

-- 
Krzysztof Sobkowiak (@ksobkowiak)

JEE & OSS Architect, Integration Architect
Apache Software Foundation Member (http://apache.org/)
Apache ServiceMix Committer & PMC Member (http://servicemix.apache.org/)
Senior Solution Architect @ Capgemini SSC (http://www.capgeminisoftware.pl/)

Reply via email to